Changing Planet

Physicists Find a Way to Generate Energy From Nuclear Waste

Nuclear energy is considered by many people to be the only realistic alternative to fossil fuel to power our civilization. But one of the problems of generating nuclear energy is that it generates toxic waste which can be extremely hazardous for thousands of years.

Now physicists at the University of Texas at Austin have designed a system that, when fully developed, would use fusion to relatively inexpensively destroy the waste from nuclear fission in nuclear power plants.

“Our waste destruction system, we believe, will allow nuclear power — a low carbon source of energy — to take its place in helping us combat global warming,” said Mike Kotschenreuther, senior research scientist with the Institute for Fusion Studies (IFS) and Department of Physics.


“The invention could help combat global warming by making nuclear power cleaner and thus a more viable replacement of carbon-heavy energy sources, such as coal,” he said in a university news release.

There are more than 100 fission reactors, called “light water reactors” (LWRs), producing power in the United States, the release explained. “The nuclear waste from these reactors is stored and not reprocessed. Some other countries, such as France and Japan, do reprocess the waste.”


Toxic nuclear waste is stored at sites around the U.S. Debate surrounds the construction of a large-scale geological storage site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada (located on the U.S. Department of Energy map on the right), which many maintain is costly and dangerous. The storage capacity of Yucca Mountain, which is not expected to open until 2020, is set at 77,000 tons. The amount of nuclear waste generated by the U.S. will exceed this amount by 2010.

“The physicists’ new invention could drastically decrease the need for any additional or expanded geological repositories,” UT said.


Angela Wong

“Most people cite nuclear waste as the main reason they oppose nuclear fission as a source of power,” said Swadesh Mahajan, senior research scientist.

Kotschenreuther, Mahajan and Prashant Valanju, of the IFS, and Erich Schneider of the Department of Mechanical Engineering report their new system for nuclear waste destruction in the journal Fusion Engineering and Design.

The scientists’ waste destruction system would work in two major steps, the UT release said.

“First, 75 percent of the original reactor waste is destroyed in standard, relatively inexpensive LWRs. This step produces energy, but it does not destroy highly radiotoxic, transuranic, long-lived waste, what the scientists call “sludge.”


In the second step, the sludge would be destroyed in a fusion-fission hybrid. “The hybrid’s potential lies in its ability to burn this hazardous sludge, which cannot be stably burnt in conventional systems,” UT explained.

“To burn this really hard to burn sludge, you really need to hit it with a sledgehammer, and that’s what we have invented here,” Kotschenreuther said.

Photo of Three Mile Island nuclear power station by Louie Psihoyos/NGS

The process would ultimately reduce the nuclear waste from the original fission reactors by up to 99 percent. Burning that waste also produces energy.

Valanju says a fusion-fission hybrid reactor has been an idea in the physics community for a long time.

“It’s always been known that fusion is good at producing neutrons and fission is good at making energy,” he says. “Now, we have shown that we can get fusion to produce a lot of neutrons in a small space.”

In moving their hybrid from concept into production, the scientists hope to make nuclear energy a more viable alternative to coal and oil while waiting for renewable energy like solar and pure fusion to ramp up.

“The hybrid we designed should be viewed as a bridge technology,” Mahajan said. “Through the hybrid, we can bring fusion via neutrons to the service of the energy sector today. We can hopefully make a major contribution to the carbon-free mix dictated by the 2050 time scale set by global warming scientists.”

Forty years in U.S., UK, and South African media gives David Braun global perspective and experience across multiple storytelling platforms. His coverage of science, nature, politics, and technology has been published/broadcast by the BBC, CNN, NPR, AP, UPI, National Geographic, TechWeb, De Telegraaf, Travel World, and Argus South African Newspapers. He has published two books and won several journalism awards. He has 120,000 followers on social media. David Braun edits the National Geographic Society blog, hosting a global discussion on issues resonating with the Society's mission and initiatives. He also directs the Society side of the Fulbright-National Geographic Digital Storytelling Fellowship, awarded to Americans seeking the opportunity to spend nine months abroad, engaging local communities and sharing stories from the field with a global audience. Follow David on Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn
  • Anthony St. John

    The tragic fact of life with this discovery that could save humanity from the hellacious consequences of out of control climate change tipping points is that for over 50 years University of California and their UC National Lab scholars have lived quite well as an academic welfare state culture that is detached from the needs of humanity because they sold out to the power of money (per Freeman Dyson in “Imagined Worlds” and President Eisenhower’s “Farewell Address to the Nation”).
    Thus UC intellectuals and their political administrators have been more than arrogant, indolent and ignorant with just perpetuating the maintenance of their LLNL holocaust bombs for over half a century, while most recently they sold out what may have remained of their integrity for $500 million to BP proving that No One Really Cares about protecting and preserving humanity at BP-UC.
    Hopefully UT will do what UC has refused to do by assigning their highest and most urgent priorities to save humanity from already excessive and out of control global warming atmospheric CO2 pollution by immediately building a hybrid fusion power station.

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (

Social Media