National Geographic Society Newsroom

Climate-smart farming cuts greenhouse gas, boosts food production

Can we eat our way to a better future for the planet’s climate? Only if we become more responsible farmers. The twin battles to improve food security for a growing world population and contain climate change can be fought on the same front–the world’s farmland, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) said today....

Can we eat our way to a better future for the planet’s climate? Only if we become more responsible farmers.

The twin battles to improve food security for a growing world population and contain climate change can be fought on the same front–the world’s farmland, the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) said today.

“Agriculture not only suffers the impacts of climate change, it is also responsible for 14 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. But agriculture has the potential to be an important part of the solution, through mitigation–reducing and/or removing–a significant amount of global emissions,” FAO said in a statement.


NGS photo of farming in Ethiopia by James P. Blair

Some 70 percent of this mitigation potential could be realized in developing countries, the agency believes.

“Many effective strategies for climate change mitigation from agriculture also benefit food security, development and adaptation to climate change,” said FAO assistant director-general Alexander Müller. “The challenge is to capture these potential synergies, while managing trade-offs that may have negative impacts on food security.”

The FAO released its report, Food Security and Agricultural Mitigation in Developing Countries: Options for Capturing Synergies, during the Barcelona Climate Change Talks this week.


The Barcelona talks are the last negotiating session before the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen next month. The Copenhagen meetings include the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and there are high hopes that the talks will produce global consensus for a workable plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions beyond 2012.

Scientists have warned that if carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere continue to rise because of human activities the planet’s climate could change drastically, setting off intense warming, droughts, flooding and rising sea levels.


NGS photo of farming in South Africa by Kip Ross

One of the options that could be part of the climate change mitigation is climate-smart farming.

The most important technical options for climate change mitigation from agriculture are improvements in cropland and grazing land management and the restoration of organic soils and degraded lands, FAO said today.

“Nearly 90 percent of the technical mitigation potential of agriculture comes from soil carbon sequestration. These options involve increasing the levels of organic matter, of which carbon is the main component, in soil. This can translate into better plant nutrient content, increased water retention capacity and better structure, eventually leading to higher yields and greater resilience.”

Agricultural mitigation options that sequester carbon can include:

  • low tillage
  • utilizing residues for composting or mulching
  • use of perennial crops to cover soil
  • re-seeding or improving grazing management on grasslands.

Other options involve difficult trade-offs, FAO noted, with benefits for mitigation but potentially negative consequences for food security and development. “In some cases, there are synergies in the long-run, but trade-offs in the short-run.”


NGS photo of farm in Virginia, U.S., by Anne Francis Revis

“Biofuel production provides a clean alternative to fossil fuel but can compete for land and water resources needed for food production. Restoration of organic soils enables greater carbon sequestration, but may reduce the land available for food production. Rangeland restoration may improve carbon sequestration but involves short-term reductions in herder incomes by limiting the number of livestock.”

Some trade-offs can be managed through measures to increase efficiency or through payment of incentives or compensation, the report says. “Many of the technical mitigation options are readily available and could be deployed immediately. But while these actions often generate a net positive benefit over time, they involve significant up-front costs.”

Other barriers, such as uncertain property rights, lack of information and technical assistance or access to appropriate seeds and fertilizer, also need to be overcome. “Linking to ongoing agricultural development efforts that address these same issues is one cost effective way of doing this,” said Kostas Stamoulis, director of the FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division.


NGS photo of citrus farm in Japan by James L. Stanfield

The report outlines possible design features for financing mechanisms that could help unlock agriculture’s potential benefits for climate change mitigation, food security and agricultural development.

“A range of financing options—public, public-private and carbon markets–are currently under negotiation for climate change mitigation actions in developing countries. These could be future sources of finance for agricultural mitigation actions, the report says, as could a dedicated international fund to support agricultural mitigation in developing countries and coordination with financing from official development assistance for agricultural development.”


NGS photo of rice farming in China by James P. Blair

Despite its significant potential, agricultural mitigation has remained relatively marginal within the climate change negotiations. FAO said.

“To capture the multiple benefits of agriculture. the report recommends a work programme on agricultural mitigation within the UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice to help address methodological issues related to implementation. It also proposes country-led piloting of action and field testing, using a phased approach linked to national capabilities and supported by capacity building and financial/technology transfers.”

About National Geographic Society

The National Geographic Society is a global nonprofit organization that uses the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of our world. Since 1888, National Geographic has pushed the boundaries of exploration, investing in bold people and transformative ideas, providing more than 14,000 grants for work across all seven continents, reaching 3 million students each year through education offerings, and engaging audiences around the globe through signature experiences, stories and content. To learn more, visit or follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook.

Meet the Author

David Max Braun
More than forty years in U.S., UK, and South African media gives David Max Braun global perspective and experience across multiple storytelling platforms. His coverage of science, nature, politics, and technology has been published/broadcast by the BBC, CNN, NPR, AP, UPI, National Geographic, TechWeb, De Telegraaf, Travel World, and Argus South African Newspapers. He has published two books and won several journalism awards. In his 22-year career at National Geographic he was VP and editor in chief of National Geographic Digital Media, and the founding editor of the National Geographic Society blog, hosting a global discussion on issues resonating with the Society's mission and initiatives. He also directed the Society side of the Fulbright-National Geographic Digital Storytelling Fellowship, awarded to Americans seeking the opportunity to spend nine months abroad, engaging local communities and sharing stories from the field with a global audience. A regular expert on National Geographic Expeditions, David also lectures on storytelling for impact. He has 120,000 followers on social media: Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn