Changing Planet

The Great (Dwindling) Barrier Reef Loses Half Its Coral Cover In Under 30 Years

The following piece was originally published at ClimateProgress.org.

If half the Grand Canyon crumbled to nothing in less than three decades, would we stand up and pay attention? If Teddy and Abe’s heads eroded off Mount Rushmore would we step in to save George and Tom?

Sadly, that’s what is happening to one of the world’s great natural treasures.

A new study released yesterday by the Australian Institute of Marine Science shows that in just the last 27 years, the Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its coral.

Coral reef degradation is unfortunately not a new phenomenon. A 2011 report from the World Resources Institute found that three-quarters of the world’s coral reefs are threatened by increased stress from pollution and climate change. Corals are very sensitive to temperature, but because they are stationary, they cannot migrate to find their prime habitat. So as ocean temperatures warm, the coral organisms die, leaving just the white skeletal structures, a phenomenon known as bleaching.

Yet according to this new study, this degradation is less directly linked to the usual suspects. Just 10 percent of the loss was attributable to bleaching. The study found coastal storms were the leading culprit that caused 48 percent of the damage, and the remaining 42 percent was a result of an exploding population of the crown of thorns starfish that preys on coral.

Don’t mistake these causes for reason to think climate change isn’t responsible. After all, an increase in intensity of coastal storms is undoubtedly a symptom of planetary warming.

Controlling the starfish problem, it turns out, would allow the reef’s degradation — pegged at losses of between four and eight percent of coral cover per year — to reverse. Even at current levels of temperature and acidity, we could see slow coral growth. The starfish problem may be slightly easier to manage than reversing global emissions of greenhouse gasses, but it will require action sure to be unpopular with agricultural interests. As CNN reports:

According to the study, the starfish in its larval stage feeds on plankton, populations of which surge when fertilizer runoff floods the coastal ocean waters with nutrients. So plentiful plankton can lead to swarms of hungry starfish.

The last time the starfish bloomed in 2003, the government spent more than $3 million to try to control the population. No easy feat. But the motivation to succeed may be as great as the Great Barrier Reef itself. In addition to the inherent value of protecting a tremendous natural resource, and the environmental benefits it provides from fish habitat to protection against storm surges, the reef is also a major economic engine in northeast Australia. According to Nick Heath, a spokesman for the World Wildlife Fund Australia, “Sixty thousand jobs in the tourism industry depend on us acting with urgency over the next few years.”

Oddly, the Australian government is also planning coal and natural gas export facilities that would bring a constant stream of ships across the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area.

With all these environmental threats and new industrial activity, apparently we’ll have to be content with renaming one of our most spectacular natural wonders the Incredibly Shrinking Barrier Reef.

Michael Conathan is the Director of Ocean Policy at the Center for American Progress

Michael Conathan is the Director of Ocean Policy at the Center for American Progress.

  • Sandeep Goswami

    It is a shocking event, but sadly these reports and pages would be more read by the likes of us, who already understand to some extent the effects of Global Warming.
    What is required by WRI and the UN is sustained media campaign on popular TV channels along with explanation of how such changes would directly affect the life we know. Both ecomocially and ecologically.
    But the most challanging task would be to balance the ecological good with business opportunity saving the planet would harbinger.
    Perhaps then the World has a fighting chance. Because the rate of growth of the truly environmentally aware is very small compared to the time window we have to abate climate change

  • camdhabadd

    Wow

  • shawn

    It is a shocking event, but sadly these reports and pages would be more read by the likes of us, who already understand to some extent the effects of Global Warming.
    What is required by WRI and the UN is sustained media campaign on popular TV channels along with explanation of how such changes would directly affect the life we know. Both ecomocially and ecologically.
    But the most challanging task would be to balance the ecological good with business opportunity saving the planet would harbinger.
    Perhaps then the World has a fighting chance. Because the rate of growth of the truly environmentally aware is very small compared to the time window we have to abate climate change.

  • None

    omg

  • google

    poor barrier reef

  • shawn

    wow that was a lot of infro but that is retarded

  • @CorettaJackson

    Disturbing news. Global warning is real.

  • Sam

    Incredibly sad news 🙁

  • vitor

    o ser humano gasta milhões em planetas sem vida e deixa morrer o planeta terra,não tem lógica…

  • Achsah

    So sad, I am crying here…. OMG…

  • Achsah

    So sad, I am crying here…. OMG…

  • Chris Coverdale

    Get rid of fuel run cars and run them on the latest liquid air engines now been designed.

  • Chris Coverdale

    Get rid of fuel run cars and run them on the latest liquid air engines now been designed.

  • Jai

    I feel sorry for the great barrier reef 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁

  • Jai

    I feel sorry for the great barrier reef 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁

  • Nathan

    Im pissed that no gives a damn about it enough to do anything about it. I live in Australia and I’d swear that no one what’s to do anything about it then where left wondering what happens in 20 years when it’s all but gone.

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (dbraun@ngs.org)

Social Media