Changing Planet

Warming Up To Shrinking Fish

By Elizabeth Brown and Carl Safina

A few years ago, some scientists at the University of British Columbia were thinking about how climate change would affect fish. Climate change results from the collection of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from our burning of fossil fuels (oil, coal, gas), which causes the earth to warm. The scientists wondered out loud if warming could affect fish growth. Warmer waters hold less oxygen than cold water. And, as the water warms, fish need more oxygen to perform daily activities, like feeding. They asked how these competing factors would affect fish size: Would a fish be able to grow large as warmer water causes oxygen concentration to drop even as the fish’s oxygen needs increase?

Graph from NOAA, National Climate Data Center ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators

 

And so, they set up a model to look at how predicted rises in ocean temperatures will change fish body size and fish distributions between the years 2000 to 2050. They input information on distribution, growth rates, temperature preferences, etc. for over 600 marine fish species (including groupers, cods, flounders, salmon, and other commercial species).

The model confirmed the scientists’ predictions: warming will limit the size fish grow to. This means SHRINKING fishes! By 2050, warming will shrink the average maximum body weight of fishes by 14-24% globally – a fairly large amount! Most of the shrinkage will happen in tropical and mid-latitude regions.  Fish will also shift their distributions towards the poles. So, smaller tropical fish will displace larger fish found at higher latitudes. Warming has already affected some fish species. In the North Sea, for example, increasing ocean temperatures have reduced the body size of haddock.

 

 

 

 

2000

 

 

 

 

 

               2050

What will shrinking fish mean for marine ecosystems? Smaller fish produce less offspring than larger fish. So, we will have less productive fish populations. Also, because body size determines predator-prey relationships, it will change marine food webs. Bigger fish can consume bigger prey. And, they have fewer predators than small fish.

Our fisheries will suffer too. Fishermen will catch smaller fish. This will in turn reduce the global fish supply.  This adds to the problems our fisheries face from overfishing, pollution, and habitat degradation.

To make matters worse, climate change could affect fish species in other ways too. In addition to warming, climate change makes our oceans more acidic. Other scientists found that ‘ocean acidification,’ could reduce the survival of fish eggs and larvae and impair a fish’s ability to detect predators.
The message is clear: climate change threatens marine fishes and the stability of our global fisheries. This underlines yet another reason we must urgently reduce carbon emissions and utilize clean energy to power our future. Further, fishery managers must develop management strategies that incorporate the effects of a changing environment.

Visit Blue Ocean Institute’s climate change page to learn more about the issue and what you can do to help fight it. Check out the article about shrinking fish at Nature Climate Change.

Carl Safina is author of seven books, including Song for the Blue Ocean, which was a New York Times Notable Book of the Year, Eye of the Albatross, Voyage of the Turtle, and The View From Lazy Point. Safina is founding president of The Safina Center at Stony Brook University, where he also co-chairs the University's Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science. A winner of the 2012 Orion Award and a MacArthur Prize, among others, his work has been featured in outlets such as The New York Times, National Geographic, CNN.com and The Huffington Post, and he hosts “Saving the Ocean” on PBS. The paperback version of Safina's seventh book, "Beyond Words: What Animals Think and Feel," is available in stores July 12, 2016.
  • Vishal

    I think it’s great that we are becoming more and more aware of the consequences entailed in climate change. I’d love to see the model proposed. Based on the abstract it seems they are basing their argument over observing that their is more change in around the tropics. There is however the other factor, fisheries. Fisheries have a minimum size to the fish the can catch (as to allow them to spawn again) however there is not a maximum size allowed for them to catch. With fisheries catching the larger fish, smaller fish (juvenile and adult) escape the nets and are allowed to reproduce. With more smaller fish escaping this sort of ‘unnatural selection’ is the leading cause to fish becoming smaller over the year – the smaller fish are allowed to reproduce rather the larger ones. Climate change is a big deal, but so is making laws for such mass producing companies in order to keep populations in between their extremes (bell curved), as nature intended.

  • Vishal Verma

    *These changes are also bad for the health of fish populations, because smaller/younger fish produce fewer eggs compared to larger/older fish. So it makes fish populations less productive and ultimately less resilient to fishing.

  • Vishal Verma

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (dbraun@ngs.org)

Social Media