3 Mammals That “Choose” Their Babies’ Sex

By systematically combing through 90 years of breeding records from the San Diego Zoo, scientists discovered mammals can “choose” the sex of their offspring, a new study says.

Tracing zoo birth records through three generations, the researchers found evidence for a decades-old theory of evolutionary biology: Mammals rely on some unknown physiological mechanism to manipulate the sex ratios of their young. (Also read why some female animals store semen.)

An infant Francois’ langur in a Sydney, Australia zoo. Photograph by Lorinda Taylor, Taronga Zoo/Getty Images

The end result of this mysterious phenomenon is more grandchildren, and hence more of the original parents’ genes in the gene pool, according to the study, published July 10 in PLOS ONE.

“This is one of the holy grails of modern evolutionary biology—finding the data which definitively show that when females choose the sex of their offspring, they are doing so strategically to produce more grandchildren,” lead author Joseph Garner of Stanford University said in a statement.

Scientists still don’t know how female mammals’ bodies influence the gender of their unborn babies, or exactly what factors might tip the scales in favor of more boys or more girls. (Also see “Heat Triggers Sex Change in Lizards by ‘Turning Off’ Key Gene.“)

This new study only demonstrates that biased sex ratios—not the 50/50 boy/girl ratio that one would expect by chance—happen in mammals.

So what are some of these mammals manipulating the sex of their babies?

1) Vaal Rhebok

The vaal rhebok is a species of antelope native to southern Africa. It may not look scary, but the males of this species have a violent reputation.

Herds are made up of several females and one dominant male who mates with all of them. That male will defend his harem from solitary males looking to get lucky with snorting, stamping, and chasing, and if those don’t work, serious fighting that often ends with the death of one of the contestants. (Also see “Male Antelope Scare Females Into Staying for Sex.”)

For these antelope, it’s a safe bet to have a daughter, who will become a harem member and reproduce each breeding season. But having a son is risky—he may never mate at all.

However, females that give birth to a harem-holding male hit the genetic jackpot in terms of number of grandchildren.

2) Francois’ Langur

This medium-size Asian primate is quite the looker, with black silky hair, distinguished white sideburns from its ears to the corners of its cheeks, and a tall and pointy crest of black hair on its head.

Langurs live in matriarchal groups led by the females. A social hierarchy exists for the females, although they all share in the responsibility of raising baby langurs. Groups usually only have one adult male, and young males set off in search of groups of their own when they reach sexual maturity.

Although the study found having more sons than daughters resulted in more grandchildren than having an equal number of sons and daughters, a similar but smaller effect was seen in the opposite direction. (Read: “How a Tiny Critter Has Seven (Yes, Seven) Sexes.”)

Giving birth to more daughters also led to more grandchildren than having a balanced sex ratio. This could be due to matriarchal species like Francois’ langurs: Females high up on the social totem pole can increase their odds of passing on their genes by having more daughters.

3) Human Beings

Although not studied in the new research, there’s some tantalizing evidence that this phenomenon applies to people as well.

For instance, the top-ranking wives in polygamous societies are more likely to have sons than the lower-ranking wives, according to an analysis of 19th-century Mormons. And a 2009 survey of 400 U.S. billionaires found they were more likely to have sons than daughters.

Why sons are favored are unknown, but it may be related to social factors: In the case of polygamous societies, sons hold the economic power in the family. As for the billionaires, the researchers hypothesize having more sons helps keep wealth within the family.

And, of course, those mothers with the means to do so can now choose the sex of their babies through in vitro fertilization.

More sons could translate to more grandchildren for many mammals, but scientists have yet to comment on the stresses associated with raising a passel of boys.

Mary Bates is a freelance science writer living in Boston. She has a PhD in psychology from Brown University where she studied bat echolocation. You can visit her website at www.marybateswriter.com and follow her on Twitter at @mebwriter.
  • ruphin

    It really unbeliveble

  • Jennifer

    Another factor is that in humans it’s easier for a woman to find a mate who is higher in status than her than it is for a man. Higher status families tend to produce more healthy offspring.

  • Ima Ryma

    I’ll be a monkey’s mom, I’ll be.
    He’s just useful to put seed in
    Matriarchal society.
    Us gals should run the show – amen!
    I’ve heard, humans study my kind,
    And do their charts and graphs and stuff,
    And fancy formulate to find
    That we can rig the game enough,
    So she’s far outnumber the he’s,
    To best assure that she’s will rule
    My family tree of monkeys,
    And carry on this good gene pool.

    A Francois langur, humans call
    Me. Named for some French DUDE! What gall!

  • acm

    This has been known for a long time, right? I mean, regular ol’ deer produce more females in lean seasons and more males in lush seasons, for a reason similar to the antelopes above (that is, a really fit male can end up with lots of mates, but every female will probaby get mated).

  • Shiladitya Mitra

    It also happens in other mammals and even some marsupials also. The milk composition also changes accordingly..

  • Andrew Howley

    I hope someone is looking into the mechanisms for this. Is it the release of a hormone that filters out x- or y-chromosome sperm, or that makes the egg more receptive to one or the other? Is it a response to a developing embryo that rejects it if it’s the “wrong” sex? Is there something in the males that makes their x- or y-chromosome sperm more viable?

    And then how well can it be controlled mentally or by certain behaviors or by creating certain environmental conditions?

    However it works, it’s a great illustration that the processes of life, from the first moment of conception (and maybe even before that), are far more complex and responsive to the environment than are glossed over when we talk about random genetic mutation driving development and evolution.

    Stories like things show so clearly that living things respond bodily to their environments both physical and social, and that this affects the lives of their developing offspring as well.

    I have a feeling that in 15 years Lamarck is going to get a much more favorable treatment in high-school biology classes than he has to date.

  • Simone

    Actually, it said in the Jan 2012 issue of National Geographic that more women are born under stressful conditions, like famine. It seems more likely it has to do with dominance = more resources / better nutrition / less stress, than the female body somehow knowing that sons will hang onto the family fortune “better” (why would the researchers claim they do in America in 2009 anyway?)

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (dbraun@ngs.org)

Social Media