With One-Third of Largest Aquifers Highly Stressed, It’s Time to Explore and Assess the Planet’s Groundwater

NASA’s twin-satellite mission known as GRACE has helped scientists estimate how much water is being depleted from the world’s major aquifers, but there is great uncertainty about how much water these aquifers hold. Image courtesy of NASA.

Imagine if your bank statement arrived each month and told you how much money you had withdrawn and deposited, but told you nothing about how much money you had at the beginning or end of the month.

You’d know whether your balance had grown or shrunk, but you’d have no idea whether you could afford to buy a new house, take a vacation, or make it through that last year of college without bussing tables on the weekends.

This is pretty much the state we’re in with the world’s groundwater accounts, which supply 2 billion people with drinking water and irrigate a large share of the world’s food.

“[I]n most cases, we do not know how much groundwater exists in storage,” write the authors of a study published last month in Water Resources Research (WRR), a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

As a result, we’re clueless about how long we can keep drawing down these water reserves before they run out.

And we are indeed drawing many of them down.

One-third of the world’s 37 largest aquifers are highly stressed to over-stressed, according to a companion study published in the same issue of WRR. The eight most highly stressed aquifers receive almost no natural recharge to offset human use – including aquifers in Saudi Arabia, northwestern India and Pakistan.

Scientists at the University of California at Irvine led both studies, with doctoral student Alexandra Richey serving as lead author. Other team members came from NASA, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, National Taiwan University and UC Santa Barbara.

Satellites Help Measure Depletion

Thanks to a NASA satellite mission launched in 2002 called GRACE (for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment), scientists have gotten some good estimates of changes in water storage in key parts of the world. GRACE deploys a pair of satellites to measure variations in Earth’s gravity, which is influenced by the weight of water.

In a 2014 commentary in Nature Climate Change, Jay Famiglietti, senior water scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, professor at UC-Irvine and a coauthor of both WRR studies, summarized depletion rates derived from GRACE data for nine important aquifer systems around the world.

Taken together, the depletion rates for the nine groundwater basins totaled more than 77 billion cubic meters per year. That’s equivalent to losing more than four Colorado Rivers worth of water annually.

Nearly all of these aquifers supply irrigation water to agricultural regions crucial to national and global food security – from the U.S. High Plains to Northwestern India to China’s North Plain.

But without knowing how much water each aquifer holds in storage to begin with, there’s no way to gage how long such depletion can go on, and which areas might run out of water first.

The 37 largest aquifers in the world. Those colored in red and orange are the most stressed.  Knowledge is limited about how much water these aquifers contain.  Image courtesy of University of California-Irvine.
The 37 largest aquifers in the world. Those colored in red and orange are the most stressed. Knowledge is limited about how much water these aquifers contain. Image courtesy of University of California-Irvine.

Even more troubling, for a number of aquifers examined by the UC-Irvine team the historical estimates of groundwater storage exceeded more-recent estimates by several orders of magnitude. That means in many areas the actual groundwater supply is much less than previously thought.

The main reason is that historical estimates are fairly crude. They often assumed, for example, that an aquifer’s water-holding capacity was constant across its whole area, whereas in reality it can vary quite a bit.

The team found, for example, that depending on which storage estimates were used, the time-to-depletion for the Northwestern Sahara Aquifer, which underlies Algeria, Libya and Tunisia, ranged from 10 years to 21,000 years.

Likewise, when new groundwater storage estimates are taken into account, two groundwater systems of great importance to food security in India and China – the Ganges and North China aquifers, respectively – appear more vulnerable to depletion than previously thought.

Lastly the researchers point to the Ogallala in the U.S. High Plains as an example of how variable an aquifer system can be across its geographic area.

The Ogallala extends from southern South Dakota to northwest Texas and supplies water to 27 percent of U.S. irrigated land. Its northern portion gets good recharge and, despite its use for large-scale irrigation, is relatively stable. The southern portion, however, is highly vulnerable to depletion. Some areas could run out of water in 30 years.

Knowing our Groundwater Accounts

With farms and cities increasingly turning to groundwater sources, especially during prolonged droughts when surface supplies shrink, we clearly need to get a better handle on just how large our groundwater reserves are so that we can better plan and manage their use.

What’s needed is a coordinated effort to explore, map and assess the planet’s aquifers – including more accurate estimates of how much water is in storage, what share of the stored water is technically recoverable, and how the groundwater’s quality varies with depth.

NASA’s Famiglietti makes the point that very few of the planet’s aquifers have been explored in the thorough manner that oil reserves have.

The bottom line: If water is to the 21st century what oil was to the 20th, then global food security and regional peace and stability depend on filling this knowledge gap soon.

Sandra Postel is director of the Global Water Policy Project, Freshwater Fellow of the National Geographic Society, and author of several books and numerous articles on global water issues.  She is co-creator of Change the Course, the national freshwater conservation and restoration campaign being piloted in the Colorado River Basin.

Sandra Postel is director of the Global Water Policy Project and author of Replenish: The Virtuous Cycle of Water and Prosperity. From 2009-2015, she served as Freshwater Fellow of the National Geographic Society. Sandra is also co-creator of Change the Course, the national water stewardship initiative awarded the 2017 US Water Prize for restoring billions of gallons of water to depleted rivers and wetlands. The recipient of several honorary degrees, she works to bridge science, policy, and practice to promote innovative ways of securing water to meet both human and ecosystem needs.
  • Todd – Water Wells

    This is cool that the groundwater is being monitored from space.

  • Gregory W. Sparks

    This maybe fine and dandy. However the reality of the situation on the ground is real. The landowners have no real choice if we disagree with the fracking companies then they by the rights right out of our counties by the court actions which we have not the funds to fight. And take the land for the better of the so called better of us all. But the Aquafer is the one paying the long term price. This limestone shell they are punching holes in and getting gas from sure its made of nature and lets gas through in time. But it also filters our ground water as it passes through. If crumbled up. in masses in these areas with this junk oils and sludge they pump in it will mix with our water and be pushed for many miles with the gases. Contaminating our water maybe not immediate this very day but it will be coming back in few years to bite us when the rich ones have long since died and gone. No money is worth what the nature has created for us and here we are destroying it. Plus the molecule of the escaping gases from this being burned off is 25 times more harmful than the one simple carbon molecule. Plus the carbon is used in the natural process of nature. if there is more carbon the trees and weeds grow faster. giving more oxygen.
    Now they say earth has warmed up 2 to 3 degress in the past century. Ok my one simple poser to you is then Why has Mars temp also raised the same in relation to ours as well as most planets in the same area of the sun. simple fact. As the cooler you packed with Ice has only so long the ice will melt no matter what . It is the same with earth. As the Ice packs get smaller over time they will simply melt faster.. Also There is no cars on mars. I’m not saying there is no human factor in pollution, OH yes there is. BUT!!! it certainly is not the CARBON!! FACTOR!!! and there has been way too much money punched into pockets over it. We need carbon to exist. What % is your body composed of Carbon? How much Carbon does one plant consume in one single day. By the way how much does one single human need to exist for one week. People complain about CARBON the fact is without it you would be like earth without gravity just think on it for a while. Thank you
    Gregory W. Sparks

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (dbraun@ngs.org)

Social Media