Changing Planet

Opinion: Papahanaumokuakea Expansion Is Counterproductive for Hawaii’s Sustainable Fisheries

Hawaii is the most secluded island chain in the world. The ocean and the resources that come out of it are invaluable to the state. Eating and catching fish is a way of life and deeply rooted into the culture. Hawaii consumes nearly three times more seafood annually compared to the rest of the mainland. The last thing we want to do is completely wipe out our oceans and deny future generations the ability to cherish locally caught, fresh fish.

Two beautiful bigeye ahis. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.
Two beautiful bigeye ahis. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.

President Obama has recently signed a proposal to expand the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument by 350 percent, or twice the size of Texas. This monument was first started by President George W. Bush in 2006. The idea behind this massive marine sanctuary is to restore and protect coral reefs, fish and sea mammals. The 150 or so Hawaii longline fishing vessels will be prohibited from fishing in the designated area. Many speculate that with this monument expansion, Hawaii’s fishery will lose 10 percent or more of its annual catch.

Auctioneer Sam, calling out prices at Honolulu Fish Auction. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.
Auctioneer Sam, calling out prices at Honolulu Fish Auction. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.

Hawaii’s fishery is globally recognized as an innovator in sustainable fishing practices. From NOAA observers on board fishing trips to the careful and precise handling methods, Hawaii is a pioneer as a fishery. Every fishing vessel in Hawaii’s fleet is a longliner which is tracked via GPS. No net of any type is used. Each fish is caught by an individual hook and line, usually thousands of miles away from Honolulu. This makes it impossible to catch the entire school of fish and gives the greatest chance for the species to survive and reproduce.

After the weeks-long journey on the high-seas, fishing vessels offload thousands of pounds of fresh fish to the Honolulu Fish Auction. While the target is bigeye and yellowfin tuna, or ahi in Hawaiian, the longliners bring in bycatch (species caught other than the primary target species) like mahimahi, and blue marlin as well. There is very little interaction with whales, dolphins and sea turtles, and over the past decade there have been no deaths of these animals due to longlining. Per year, Hawaii lands around 25 million pounds of fish, but that only equates to 3-5 percent of the entire Pacific Ocean’s annual catch.

There is a large amount of negative publicity toward fisheries due to pollution, overfishing, and destroying coral reefs and other marine habitats. Much of the fishing by foreign fleets is done by use of trawl and purse seine nets, and this is a huge contributor to these environmental problems. Although they are used differently, both methods have the capability to net entire schools of fish and any other species in their path. Nets also damage coral reefs, and many the size of buildings have been discarded after their working lifespan and are now drifting throughout the Pacific.

Bigeye ahi from the Lady Mocha. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.
Bigeye ahi from the Lady Mocha. Photograph courtesy of Shane Yoshimoto.

With the monument expansion, foreign fishing vessels are likely to fish in these so-called protected waters. There is insufficient enforcement on the waters to control them. When Hawaii’s supply falls short because of the expansion, seafood wholesalers will have no choice but to purchase imported fish. This is product and money that should have stayed in Hawaii and the United States all along.  Importing foreign tuna does not only have a direct negative impact on Hawaii’s fishery and economy, but most countries have far lower health and safety regulations than the United States.  Salmonella and E. coli outbreaks have occurred in the past from foreign-caught tuna, and most recently Hawaii had over 200 consumers infected with Hepatitis A from tainted scallops that were from the Philippines.

While the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument may have sounded like a good idea, it is not the right answer for the state of Hawaii, its fishery, and the rest of the United States. The monument expansion proposal lacked transparency and the claims made to justify its protection are not backed by science. Our fishing regulations and consumer safety procedures cannot be compared to many foreign fisheries.  Hawaii is already fishing in a sustainable manner, and continues to look for ways of improving on this, but will pay the ultimate price.  Ahi prices will be higher, jobs will be lost, and Hawaii’s food security is at greater risk.  Both sides need to come together and look at other ways of protecting our waters and this food source that is so important to so many Americans.

Shane YoshimotoShane Yoshimoto  works as a fish buyer at the Honolulu Fish Auction for the retail and wholesale markets. He loves the ocean and his career and wants to further educate the public about Hawaii’s sustainable fishery.

Shane Yoshimoto works as a fish buyer at the Honolulu Fish Auction for the retail and wholesale markets. He loves the ocean and his career and wants to further educate the public about Hawaii's sustainable fishery.
  • V Abram Boido

    Conservation not backed by creditable science is not conservation it’s a power play with an unknown agenda and should scare everyone as who knows what restrictions will be implemented next this makes great sound bites but will have negative reactions
    not yet calculated

  • Geof Walker

    Commerical fisherman in Hawaii 35 years. This exapnsionis a travesty. It is a well crafted ploy by the government pull to deceive the Green/conservationist, into backing this expansion. It is not based on science, violates the Magnuson Fisheries Conservation & Management Act. What it will do is give the military a free pass to do what ever it does. No observers on the military operations like on the fishing boats. Ban on low frequency sonar can’t be enforced. Mysterious fish kills of deep scattering layer fauna close to the Barking Sands missile range on the fringe of the new National monument a coincidence? New expansion of Barking Sands Missile range a coincidence?
    Phony Cousteau society docudrama of the leeward Islands, who paid for it? The whole thing stinks!!

  • Noelle Cunningham

    Thank you Shane for sharing the truth. The truth is all we have at this point so lets keep sharing it. Educate our kids and rally for opportunities to continue fishing. Spread the word. This proposal was dated June 16, 2016 and passed with a signature and announced on August 26. Now that’s fast! Tell me where was the due process? Nobody asked the people of Hawaii how they would feel about giving up 60% of their aquatic farmland. Whether he fully understands what he has done or not, Brian Schatz does not respect the people he represents and I hope our people wake up and do something about it.

  • frank

    Im glad to see people are catching on. We cant let the government take away what is ours. They didnt even compensate those affected by this monument, they just took it away with an executive order. This seems so wrong, I feel terrible for the Hawaiian People.

  • Fred

    How do we work together? This video has another point of view.

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (

Social Media