Changing Planet

TNR Is Dangerous Both to Cats and to Other Animals

By Daphna Nachminovitch

By the time she called PETA for help, one of the stray cats the woman had been feeding was in critical condition, suffering from a massive tumor that had closed off his ear canal. In another case, a cat appeared at a feeder’s home with grotesquely swollen paws oozing with pus, a symptom of feline infectious peritonitis. These cats’ suffering was prolonged and agonizing but not uncommon. This is how homeless cats live—and die.

People who consider themselves “cat lovers,” including proponents of trap-neuter-release (TNR) —programs that sterilize but then abandon domestic cats and so should more aptly be called “trap-neuter-abandon“—don’t mean to consign cats to such ghastly fates, but in leaving them outside to fend for themselves, they do. The average life expectancy of an “outdoor cat” is about two to five years compared with 12 to 15 years for a cat who lives indoors. Feral cats, as well as homeless domesticated cats who have been set loose outdoors by shelters seeking to avoid the criticism that they might face from euthanizing them, commonly suffer and die from feline leukemia, feline AIDS, and other infectious diseases—even rabies. They also succumb to ailments like anemia and upper respiratory infections—conditions that are easily treatable were the cats to be taken to a veterinarian—but they are not. In winter, cats in cold climates endure subzero temperatures, some losing ears, tails, or limbs to frostbite; others being cut to shreds when they climb into car engines seeking warmth; and still others simply freezing to death.

Many cats “disappear”—and while some are hit by cars or attacked by dogs or wild predators and some succumb to parasites or starvation because they depend on humans for everything and can’t fend for themselves, others are victims of foul play. PETA’s files are bursting with cases in which cats who were put outdoors without supervision, including those in “managed colonies,” have been shot, poisoned, drowned, bludgeoned, or even set on fire by cruel people who view them as easy targets or “pests” and don’t want them climbing on their cars or defecating in their yards. Recent attacks include a cat in Mississippi who died after someone doused her with hot liquid, a cat in New York who suffered extensive chemical burns, and a cat in Maryland who was found dead with “visible injuries” and next to a note that read, “The cats must go. ”

TNR programs are doomed to failure because of basic population dynamics: Even if all of the cats in a “colony” are eventually spayed and neutered (which is nearly impossible), the food set out for them will always attract “new” cats. And feeding cats also promotes abandonment, since people are more inclined to abandon their cats if they believe that someone else will “take care of” them.

Dr. Michael W. Fox—well-known veterinarian, columnist, and author—wrote in a column recently, “Obviously, cats that are neutered and then released outdoors are not going to breed, but they are likely to suffer far more than indoor cats (and those unadopted ones kept in enclosed sanctuaries) from injuries and disease, kill wildlife and pose a public health risk from some of the diseases they can transmit to humans.” Indeed, TNR programs are both a threat to public safety and harmful to native wildlife. Cats were recently dubbed the most deadly invasive species in the world by the authors of a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and are believed to be responsible or partly responsible for the extinction of 63 species. They pose a serious threat to wildlife, including mammals, reptiles, and birds, who are already struggling with habitat destruction and environmental degradation. One study estimates that free-roaming cats kill up to 24 billion wild animals and birds every year, by far the largest human-caused toll on birds.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has warned that maintaining feral cat colonies can lead to an increase in the incidence of rabies transmission from cats to humans. Cats can also spread other diseases to humans, including typhus, an outbreak of which in California was thought to be linked to feral cats. A man in Oregon was diagnosed with bubonic plague after being bitten by a cat who was allowed to roam outdoors. And at least seven wallabies died in a Virginia zoo because of toxoplasmosis transmitted by a colony of outdoor cats.

Trapping and abandoning cats is hazardous to all involved, certainly including the cats themselves. Homeless cats deserve to be treated like any other cat. They deserve a chance to be adopted into a loving home or, if that isn’t possible, to be peacefully euthanized in a safe and quiet environment, rather than turned out onto the street to fight daily battles for survival that they will ultimately lose. Cat abandonment is illegal because it’s inhumane, and it’s not the answer to the homeless-cat crisis. The answer is to require that all cats be spayed and neutered, licensed, microchipped, and kept indoors.

Daphna Nachminovitch headshotDaphna Nachminovitch is the senior vice president of cruelty investigations for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. She has overseen many undercover investigations and countless cruelty cases that have led to criminal charges against animal abusers. Under her leadership, PETA has spayed and neutered more than 139,000 dogs and cats since 2001.

 

 

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service. For those who don’t read the community rules, we remind you that comments that are abusive towards others (individuals or institutions) are not approved for publication. Differences of opinion are okay; personal attacks are not.

  • Connie Black

    I share my life with 2 ex-barn cats, now indoor only cats. I just don’t understand how anyone can think that TNR (Trap Neuter Re-abandon) can be humane or kind. Thank you so much for your excellent article Daphna.

  • Henry George

    Hear, hear. TNR is cruelty to animals. When I worked as a humane officer, we cited or arrested people for abandoning animals. Where are our humane officers and police today? How can this be allowed? I’m thankful that PETA takes this stand and is helping educate the public on this important issue. I can’t count the number of cats whose broken bodies I have had to scrape off the street, barely clinging to life after they were hit by cars, attacked by dogs, eaten alive by maggots, and found literally suffocating on their own mucous. It is far more humane to euthanize homeless domestic (which means dependent) animals than abandon them to die in horrible ways, alone and forsaken.

  • Beth

    Great article. Sadly TNR advocates don’t want to address the cruelty to the cats, the huge impact cats as a domesticated animal has on wildlife, the human health risks, and the nuisance caused by the cats.

  • Donna Nespoli

    Excellent article. I wish TNR folks like Alley cat Allies would stop dumping cats back on the streets. We don’t do it to dogs, or domestic rabbits or birds…then why is it OK to do it with cats?

  • Duff Smith

    A lot of people in local government call for the two sides on this issue to “sit down and talk,” but this article clearly spells out one of two major reasons why there’s nothing to talk about. The idea that dying outdoors from “natural causes” is more humane than professional euthanasia is utter nonsense. Yet, colony caretakers adhere religiously to this. The other major sticking point is that the lives of other animals that die from infection or predation are worthless in their minds. They are to serve as food and toys to the one species of animal they care about. Here in the Florida Keys there is currently 90-100% interference with the civil process for dealing with nuisance cats, and a lot of happy cat farmers. Every cat brought to the shelter is neutered and passed back to an outdoor hoarder in open violation of our municipal codes. I’m sorry to the people looking forward to the arrival of migratory birds this spring on the US east coast, because we are losing down here.

  • frederick domer

    Neutering feral cats is better than doing nothing (which is what PETA is suggesting)
    Support TNR. Don’t let a blizzard of distortions obscure the obvious.

  • LucyP

    Thank you for this well-reasoned piece. “Feral” cats are no better equipped to survive outdoors than the cats who share our homes are. They are domesticated, and leaving them on the streets or in the woods is abandonment. They die miserably, after days or weeks of suffering, instead of painlessly. This is not kind.

  • Heather

    I agree. Until everyone has their cats spayed or neutered and keeps them safely indoors, cats–as well as birds and other wildlife–will continue to suffer and die. TNR programs may appease people’s consciences, but they do nothing to help animals. Euthanasia is the most merciful and realistic option when dealing with feral cats and other animals who are struggling to survive on the streets.

  • Catgrrl63

    TNR isn’t “better than doing nothing,” for a couple of reasons. One is that the food put out for cats attracts more cats (and rats, mice, raccoons, and other animals). Another is that cats who are fed are better able to reproduce (which is an issue since it is nearly impossible to spay and neuter every cat right away, or even at all). Also, people opposed to TNR aren’t suggesting “doing nothing.” They are suggesting mandating spay/neuter and leash laws for ALL cats and trapping and removing homeless cats instead of putting them back outdoors.

  • Susan C McDonough

    I was a NYS Trooper for 26 years and my field of expertise focused on animal cruelty. Cats were the number one victims of abandonment, torture and neglect. I also spent 15 years as a wildlife rehabilitator. Almost all of the songbirds who were brought to me were victims of cats, most of these birds died of puncture wounds. euthanasia is very sad, but it isn’t cruel. Forcing cats to live on the streets is cruel. Thank you PETA, for having the guts to be truthful about this issue. Cat licensing and keeping cats indoors are the only answers to this problem.

  • Jennofur OConnor

    I agree 100 percent. Life on the streets is no life at all. Dodging traffic and cruel people, scrounging for food, finding a warm and dry place to sleep, always feeling unsafe … they don’t belong in the streets.

  • KimMarie

    I’m so glad that Nat Geo published this article because too many people don’t understand TNR programs and that they inevitably fail the animals they’re designed to “help”.

  • Evelyn

    I support TNR, have seen it’s effectiveness. Much of what is in this article is provably untrue! I’ve worked in cat rescue for about 15 years. The rescue group I work with adopts out about 350-400 cats & kittens each year, I foster dozens in my home every year & often socialize scared, feral kitties who haven’t had much or any human contact. –>> it’s not possible to to tame every cat/kitten that people find! Feral-born cats aren’t domestic animals or pets – over about 4 months of age, they don’t get tamed easily, and aren’t likely adoptable candidates. –>> While TNR isn’t perfect, I’d much rather see TNR in place in a community than automatically killing every stray or feral cat that gets brought into an animal shelter. Statistics have proven that years of killing thousands of them every year doesn’t reduced neighborhood cat populations, but managed TNR programs do. Allowing them to live – similar to raccoons & bunnies & squirrels – rather than catching & killing them, is much more humane than automatically killing every one that gets caught.

  • Paula Renee

    I share my home with two cats who had been picked up as strays. When Mochi was first found by animal control officers, he had a nasty wound on one of his back legs, most likely from being attacked by a dog. To this day, Mochi’s leg gives him trouble, and he sometimes stumbles when he tries to run or jump. The “great outdoors” is not great for cats—keep them inside!

  • Catherine A Scarano

    I have done TNR for over a decade and I can assure you that my colonies are well cared for, neutered, vaccinated ,vetted when injured or sick and have warm shelters.

    It is statistically impossible to euthanize all feral or dumped community cats. If cats are removed and euthanized other cats will eventually fill the vacuum and those cats are most likely not neutered or vaccinated so you are back to where you started. Also it is very hard for Animal Control to trap all cats due to lack of resources. The only solution to the problem of community cats is an affordable spay/neuter program and townships that have a TNR program that brings together Animal Control and the grass roots TNR groups to work the problem together. It’s a numbers problem that is not solved by black and white thinking.

  • Debra Hoffmann

    I’m sorry, but this is absolutely not the case. I’m mom to 19 cats. They are all rescues, all indoor cats (they have a catio that is enclosed and a screened porch). We do TNR. If I find ‘friendly” cats, I work to get them into good homes. They are neutered, treated medically for any issues they have, and I find a foster or find placement, if possible. If they are non social to people, they are neutered, tattooed and ear tipped. I care for my TNR’d cats, and many have been with me for years. It should also be noted that when we moved from one state to another, I trapped the last of the old colony I had cared for and took him with us. He now lives an indoor life. He isn’t social to me, but he is to my other cats, somewhat. While it would be wonderful for every non human friendly cat to have someone to work with them and give them a home whether or not they come around, this doesn’t happen often. My TNR’d old colony had a fairly good long life. They ate well, got vet care, and had shelters. They also hunted the mice on the property that the store owner who’s lot they backed was grateful for.
    TNR’d cats do not decimate populations of wild species, wild species are decimated due to humans invading habitats, development, and loss of habitat.
    Killing cats-which is what PETA believes in, by the way-is never the answer.

  • Joanne Kaufman

    This is an incredibly biased and misinformed opinion piece. The TNR movement is predicated on the fact that a responsible caretaker is managing the colony, which involves monitoring for medical conditions as well as feeding. It would be most appropriate if the TNR people added an “M” for management. My colony cats are well-fed and accordingly, eat side by side with visiting ducks. They don’t attack people — on the contrary, they are afraid of human content and keep their distance. I have had to trap cats and have them euthanized or medically treated because I won’t tolerate a suffering animal. Cats are homeless through no fault of their own. Some were abandoned; others were dumped for a variety of nonsensical reasons. The laws on animal cruelty and abandonment need to be strictly enforced rathet than killing cats on a massive scale. Besides, since cats are territorial, if the cats in a particular colony are all killed (how barbaric), new ones will come in to take over the space. PETA has a terriblel track record with domesticated animals and their disdain has poisoned the debate.

  • Barbara DeGrande

    While the outdoor life is often much harsher than an indoor life, that is not really the option for these cats, but statistics show that programs which trap/neuter/vaccinate and release to loving colony caregivers can give the cats a good quality of life. The high kill rates at many shelters prior to entering into a TNR program have seen large reductions in killing, lower intakes, and high live release rates for cats after TNR. These are lives saved. Additionally in our own TNR program, we often find field kittens that can be funneled into adoption programs and have found homes for dozens ourselves. We at Grand Prairie CAT CREW are committed to ending homelessness for cats and respect their lives. We have caregivers who get them vet care when needed and we support these compassionate people. Many of our caregivers offer these cats a secure outdoor area with shelters, twice daily food, and lots of love. Killing is not the answer.

  • Tamara. Whitaker

    Please educate yourself before accepting what PETA promotes TNR works.For every vet that agreed with PETA there is 5 that will promote and practices TNR.
    Check out the stats on TNR and the people and vets who practice TNT

  • Debbie McClendon

    I have a couple of feral cat colonies, one being 24-26 cats, all TNRd. My colony cats are very loved and cared for, they are healthy and I notice immediately if one is sick or injured and get them medical care. They have shelter and are in a safe gated area where they have lived for many years. Outdoors might not be the best place for them but they do not want for anything and are very protected from the weather. They love me and follow my car when I drive in to feed them. You are irresponsible to say they should be dead. I’ve even worked with some of them and they are living in homes now. So please quit making blanket comments like this because it’s just not true

  • Silvia

    While my comment is in moderation, and probably will not pass… please visit ‪#‎PETAKills‬ on Facebook and read.

  • Judy Price

    There will always be people who think that only humans have a right to walk the earth and have some sense of freedom. Being locked inside forever is safer for kids too–no risk of car accident, sports injury, kidnapping, school shooting. Cat deserve the right to the outdoors as much as people, and dogs (never see the same recommendation for dogs) and cats are even more driven to have that freedom. TNR is NOT about abandoning cats after they are trapped and fixed; responsible people make sure there are colony caregivers. Outdoor cats can have a great life. Whereas cats incarcerated inside a house forever develop the ‘modern American’ diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, hyperthyroidism. It’s clear to me that the lifespan averages here are very skewed, but even IF outdoor cats didn’t live as long, there is the very important consideration of quality versus quantity. If I had 20 years of living inside my house only compared to 10 years of being able to have the freedom to go out in my yard and roam the mountains, I would choose the 10 years EVERY TIME. Maybe the author would not, so I suggest she commit to staying inside forever in order to stay safe.

  • Laura Borders

    I cannot disagree with the author more. I have no doubt she has found these instances of disease and injury in TNR colony cats. They do not have the life expectancy of a cat that lives indoors: that is obvious. The goal of TNR is to provide a life along with a lifetime of care. That’s what my cats get. Disease and injury come to indoor cats too. As for animal cruelty, as long as there is a stray cat, or dog, in the world, there will be abuse. That is a larger issue.

    And there is the larger issue. What will you do with all the stray cats that exist now, on your way to your nirvana of all cats indoors, etc? What is your plan for a humane life for all the strays right now? I don’t see one word about that. If TNR isn’t good enough for you then what is YOUR answer to the problem right now?

    As for your data, there are other studies that refute cats as the primary cause of extermination and extinction, citing the human hand as the larger killer of everything from insects to mammals. We can Lexus/Nexus that all day long.

    I want to know: what id your answer to what to do now with all the stray cats in the world? I think you need to get out in the field and get your hands dirty. Trap a cat and save its life. The life expectancy of an unfixed, unvaccinated cat is about three years. I’ll be waiting for your answer.

  • Sara Pike

    Colony caretaking is an essential part of TNR – this method does not include the abandonment of cats. Please research the method before making these claims. Alley Cat Allies or The Nobody’s Cats Foundation can provide information on the holistic nature of this work.

  • Laura Borders

    One final note: here in rabies-endemic Georgia, raccoons are the main rabies vector. You have much more to fear from those guys on your back porch. I cannot recall a case of cat rabies in Metro Atlanta for my 30 years here. You may want to check the stats but rabies is not an issue with TNR cats here.

    Further, these stray cats cited in the instances are strays, I don’t see anyone saying these are specifically TNR cats. They have tipped ears. Should be easy to tell. Let’s be specific.

    As for killing them being preferable to life in a colony, sorry, no. And you can’t have my ferals either. They live a good life and I, as all the colony tenders I know, am only concerned with providing the best possible care I can at my own expense. I hand-raise kittens too that have lost their mothers and place them in safe homes. Guess you’d like to kill their mommas too, as they are always ferals. Nope, not mine.

  • Dottie Berzins

    If TNR is inhumane and unkind, what about those animals that peta “saves” by killing them. Better dead than owned? I bet if you asked those cats who died in “shelters” and other killing places, they would choose life every time. Managed cat colonies can do wonderfully well. And, where I live, the hawks take more prey than cats do. Life is precious, all life.

  • Julie

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/09/150901-feral-cats-birds-animals-science-nation/

    This Opinion is not appropriate for all outdoor cats. The cats I care for in our awesome community are well cared for and healthy and love life, as are all of the other volunteers in my community that care for their colonies appropriately. If a cat is found to be good inside a home then they are adopted out. Not all cats that are great want to be inside a home. It all depends on the cat. This broad stroke opinion is just that… This is not a fair or balanced opinion.

  • Craig Shapiro

    I couldn’t agree more. My girls are 15 and 13 have been insiders their entire lives. They are happy, healthy and safe.

  • Gina Davis

    Thank you, PETA! PETA always stands up for animals, even when other organizations have shunned them. I remember reading about PETA being upset when a fly was swatted, and I’m vegan because of all the things I’ve read and seen on their web site. If TNR was good for cats and wildlife, if it helped animals in any way, PETA would be promoting it. Euthanasia is sad, but it is humane and dignified, unlike death on the streets. People who don’t want cats euthanized should be lobbying for laws requiring cat owners to spay and neuter, banning the sale of cats and kittens at pet shops, and helping people in their community get their cats sterilized. Spending resources to instead abandon animals on the streets is not only stupid, but cruel.

  • Bob’s mom

    I would like to ask ALL of the people who agree with this article to ask yourselves 1) who do you propose will be the ones to trap and humanely euthanize the cats? 2) when do you propose to educate people about spaying your cats if you don’t have a massive spay/neuter project in place? 3) Who is going to go door to door to tell each feeder that they cannot feed cats anymore because they will be killing them? 4) who is going to figure out these neglectful owners who are dumping cats to sufffer the consequences? Personally, I would be ok with the last one but no one is doing it. I am obviously a proponent of TNR because I see that it works. I have also saved so many friendly cats because I am out there feeding. I meet people and talk to owners and I even aid in helping the owned cats get fixed. I will NEVER be the volunteer trapper if I am going out there to trap and euthanize so you can count me out in helping your goal. If you believe in just trapping and killing because you think it is better than a life on the street aka, the cat’s home, then you are actually just satisfying your own needs, not theirs. You THINK it is better, but it isn’t necessarily. You cannot just assume you are correct without seeing all sides. Yes, we have to care about the sick and dying ones. We take IN the friendly ones. The only ones that are returned are the ones that are not socialized to people. They are protected by the laws so people who poison and kill them should be and are punished. Their selfish actions are like any other crime. Think about the cats and kittens that YOU Save by focusing on working with humane groups to spaying these outdoor cats so there is less suffering and more education. DO something caring rather than just talk, talk, talk about killing cats for “their own good” afterall, sometimes humans provide terrible homes for cats and yes, I am judging, but I have witnessed that with my own eyes. So, these articles that bash cat advocates for getting cats fixed and fed are not helping anyone, just setting up cats, and humans for a ton of disappointment and acceptance.

  • Helana

    This is for every person who thinks PETA is doing cats a favor by opposing TNVR: Why should cats die because people are irresponsible? Why are you so lazy as to do nothing about that irresponsibility? Why have you no empathy and compassion for animals abandoned by people? You judge as do many others, but you do nothing to improve the situation. So typical of PETA supporters.

  • Becky Steinmetz

    It is a shame that you do not have the facts and only take the word of a group of people who would rather kill healthy animals. TNR does work and is safe and humane for cats. Cats have been a wild animal in all communities for hundreds of years. We just domesticated them in the last hundred. Most have caregivers who provide she food and shelter. Others live fine on their own for many happy and healthy years. Of course there are always exceptions and those are what this group focused on, not the majority of the successful and happy TNR cats.

  • Jen Newman

    Apparently those of that support PETA need to do some research. TNR is indeed the only humane solution to the devastating feral cat population. You all need to know that when cats are TNR’d they were caught in their area they call home. Believe it or not, they are being cared for or they would not be alive. They are spayed/neutered, vaccinated and returned to their home (colony). They are fed daily by the ones that had the kind heart to trap them in the first place. In over 30 years I have successfully TNR’d over 200 cats. And I have had many that have lived well over 10 years. This baloney of them destroying wildlife…get your facts. It is us humans that are destroying mother nature by building on what used to be their homes. The colonies I manage live with other wildlife, including birds! They even “share” the food I leave for the cats every day. And whether you want to believe it or not the birds fly away once they are done eating. I just can not believe people support PETA. PLEASE everyone…do your research and see what PETA does with the donated money that you thought was going to help animals. As you cann see here…they rather euthanize than fix the problem which TNR is a proven fact! I think the stray dogs are going to become the next story in TNR. Stray dogs everywhere and the destruction and harm they cause…why are you focusing on cats? Dog will get a human sicker 100x’s faster than a cat. And so sad to say, but I always manage to see a dog that was hit by a car everyday compared to a cat…maybe once every 6 months! We just need to let Mother Nature run it’s course. But we also need to make spay & neutering free or affordable to everyone. Most importantly there needs to be a law and punish all of the supposed owners that leave their cats & dogs behind when they move! I have 7 now from surrounding neighbors that moved and left the cats locked inside the house! This is not the cats fault they are homeless. It is the humans for not taking care of their pets! So heartbreaking.

  • jenn Bakal

    hi Daphna, your short bio says:
    “Under her leadership, PETA has spayed and neutered more than 139,000 dogs and cats since 2001.”

    how many cats and dogs has PETA euthanized in that time?

  • Lori Reynolds

    As long as a feral colony has a caretaker and the cats are altered, vaccinated and provided proper food, water and shelter I have no problem with TNR. Whoever wrote this article obviously knows little on the subject. Since when does FIP cause swollen paws with pus? BTW, PETA is a joke. They have a very high euthanasia rate at their shelters.

  • Brie

    TNR is for un-doptable feral cats, not social cats. Feral cats will always exist from human error. TNR gives them an easier way of life and a chance at life. No cats are released to uncertainty. They have people who care for them. No kill is the humane way. Many lost or abandoned cats have been reunited with their families because of being trapped for TNR. This article is a bias opinion, PETA promotes killing feral cats. Educate properly ,not on a false , one sided, inhumane view. PETAs death toll for 2016 is astonishing. All healthy dogs and cats
    Research PETA first.
    If e had no feral cats we would be inundated with rats etc. We all can coexist and that’s proven.

  • Shawn Flynn, Author of “The Kitty: Who Rescued Me After I Rescued Him”

    I completely disagree with the author of this article! She clearly doesn’t understand what TNR is. In most cases, once a feral cat reaches a certain age, there is no hope of ever domesticating it. TNR is for feral cats, not stray cats. Anyone who has ever had any interaction with a stray cat and a feral cat know the difference between the two. Stray cats can be rehabilitated and socialized, in most cases adult feral cats can not. Well managed TNR colonies for feral cats are far more humane than simply putting them to death.

  • Bob

    I’d like to know why people defend PETA

  • Sam wood

    Awesome job. The TNR advocates hate when truth and facts slap them in the face. We need to stay on top of this epidemic before we are in the same boat Australia is in.

  • Adrienne

    I’m incredibly disappointed to see this article. You think that PETA is truly looking out for cats? They’ve only spayed/neutered 139,000 dogs or cats in 16 years? The city of Austin’s programs s/n more than 60,000 in just nine years, without the millions PETA receives every year in donations. If PETA really cares to address the plight of homeless cats, they’d put their money where their mouths are and get into communities that need free or low-cost resources/services — and education! I’ve never seen them around in any of the volunteering I’ve done. But sure, they care so much.

  • Lisa Walcott-Moreley

    Ideally every cat should have an indoor home and a human to love and spoil him. Unfortunately, we do not live in an ideal world. There simply aren’t enough homes available. TNR is much better than killing the poor cats. I personally have adopted ferals, one of which was so wild it took a year of indoor life before I could pet her. But for all cats to have a home, every person would have to adopt something like forty five cats. TNR humanely reduces the cat population without killing beautiful cats.

  • Chiitra

    TNR works and isn’t killing cats but saving many. It’s a lot of nonsense, which can be easily turned around;
    1. Neuter cats, means less or no kittens, means less cats, means less fighting.
    2. Neutering saves male cats from fighting till death or being severely injured, and females from having difficult pregnancies and kittens dying.
    3. When cats have adopted to living in the wild, it’s almost impossible to keep them inside and housetrain them, so adopting and keeping them in the house isn’t really a option. And it can cause them a lot of stress.
    4. Cats always have been smart, and lived outdoors most of the time. They are able to catch their own food and adapt well when dealing with bad weather conditions most of the time.
    5. There are not many cases known of cats getting infected with rabies or infecting people with diseases.
    6. They catch mice and rats which can save our crops and will prevent pests. Domestic cats are not so much vicious hunters
    7. There have always been colonies of feral cats (and dogs). Yes they catch a lot of birds, but by TNR there are less cats so less killing. Situation controlled.
    8. Severe punishment for people who mistreat any animal or dump them, to prevent this to happen.
    9. Common sense…

  • Adrienne

    I couldn’t disagree more with this article. If tnr was such a bad thing to do animal shelters and rescues would not offer this. Most of the cats that are in a tnr colony are too fetal to find a home which is why tnr is around . Humans as a species like to blame other species for the problems they cause around the world. Humans poison, destroy and kill off anything they find and are like a virus to this world. Peta how about instead of preaching about tnr is bad , vegan is good anything else is bad and killing pets with a 97% Rate start educating people on how to stop others from destroying the places wild animals live and help stop the poaching and senseless trophy hunting.

  • Kathi Tincher

    I’ve been doing TNR for over six years now and it DOES work. A feral cat is always released in a managed colony where it’s fed, watered and given shelter. And most people that do TNR like me will usually find inside homes for adoptable ones, but sometimes feral cats need to go back to their home.. outside. As far as rabies being transformed to a human there are hardly any known cases in the US. Cats are normally going to run away from rabid animals such as raccoons, bats and foxes. TNR keeps 24 kittens from being born a year to each female and keeps euthanasia down in shelters. As far as life expectancy goes they are going to live two or five years whether they are trapped or not. At least they aren’t producing more but instead are given a chance to live out their lives fat and happy. I will always be their voice as long as I’m here on this earth.

  • Stacey Lynn Diodato

    All my TNR kitties come inside when they get fixed they were all strays that I fed and have raised in my home as a part of my family.I then do my best to find them loving homes but I do not put them back out once they are fixed.

  • Sierra

    Well, it seems that PETA is against any animal living in cages, but is absolutely okay with the fact that a cat should be locked up at home (which is nothing more than a bigger cage if you think about it). What kind of logic is that ?
    Yes, cats on the streets die sometimes in agony, does PETA also plan on locking in homes every animal in the wolrd that lives in the wild because they do not have the divine help of humains to die peacefully ? Maybe we should follow the logic of the article and euthanize every living being because without our interfering they would probably have a natural death (and a natural life), which is obviously unfathomable here.

    Cats have been domesticated for thousands of years, but until very recently they were mostly left to fend fot themselves. They didn’t have humans to feed them and decide if they should live or die depending on the nature of their “social” status amongst us.

    The problem is not the cats, it’s the irresponsible humans that let their cats reproduce (“just once”) and give the kittens to strangers like you pick your boxe of cereals at the mall.
    WE are the reason there are so many of them, instead of punishing them with “humanely” death and house-sized cages for something they are not responsible for, WE should be the ones taking our responsabilities like real adults.
    Besides, experience has shown many, many, many times that the ones who complain are often the ones who actually do nothing. You want less cats in the streets ? Help spay/neuter strays and feral and domestic cats, tell all the people around you to do the same, volounteer in shelters, start fostering cats, stop letting your cat reproduce, say no to ANY kind of breeding (cat breeds = animal abuse !).

    Most feral cats colonies are very well supervised. When a cat is sick or hurt volunteers will catch them a second time to take them to the vet, AND humanely euthanize them if they can’t be treated or saved.
    Cats are in no way abandonned. In fact, they are often given more care an attention and love (and better food) than most basic owner will give their own animal.
    Studies have shown AND proved that TNR is way more effective than strict eradication, because when a cat disapears for whatever reason, another cat/animal will take its territory. Whereas with several cats in one place, new one are far less likely to stay, and the population is better controled.
    Country like Australia eliminate cats because they just dont spay them. They have done the same before with kangaroos and even rabbits ! This is pretty obvious to me that their method is very ineffective…

  • Ragga

    If TNR is so inhumane and cruel, what is taking a life then? Is it really okay for us to kill millions of cats just because they are “bothering” us?

  • tequila

    If you want proof TNR works, please visit Tinykittens.com.
    Over two hundred managed cats from three colonies.

  • Tracy Reinert

    I am just stunned by not only this article but also by the ignorance of some of the comments above. TNR is an amazing answer to helping homeless cats. I have 2 colonies that I care for every single day. The adoptable cats were adopted out to homes, while the others were TNR’d. They are fed daily and live in safe areas with clean shelters. They wait for me every single night to come with their food and some greet me at my truck. They all have names and deserve the right to live a full life just like every other cat. It is NOT their fault that they were dumped by some human who no longer wanted them, or whatever their circumstance may be, it is NOT their fault they they have no home and have to live outside. It is our job to keep them safe outside and well fed and cared for and my babies are just that. I do understand that not all cats outside are being well cared for, but therefore in my situation one should not say TNR is wrong or TNR does not work when clearly TNR does work and TNR is the clear humane answer!

  • Kelly Parks

    My neighbor and I have been doing TNR for the cats in our neighbor hood , I can assure you that these cats are fed, watered, sheltered and when ill trapped and take in for medical attention. I have contacts with other trapper/colony care takers and we all invest our hearts,time and money into our colonies to see that they are healthy and happy. These animals are not abandoned they are cared for and given a second chance. If in fact cats are the killers of wildlife PETA claims they would not need people to provide food for them , they would be healthy like the larger truly wild cats are. I have had colony cats that have lived to be 10 yrs old and enjoyed their lives as free roamers that were cared for and loved . PETA needs to check their facts about TNR ,rabies and the good that is done by people who truly care about life and not just killing to temporarily solve a problem.

  • Robert Moats

    So instead of TNR, you capture and kill them and this is more humane. People really agree with this, so what should we do with the homeless, if they can’t find homes shall we kill them? When can anyone say that like any animal in the wild should be killed? What makes a feral cat any different than any other wild feline? When has PETA decided what lives are more important than any other? Are you saying now that cows and pigs were breed for food, so it’s okay to kill them? I’ve lost all respect for PETA!

  • JS

    Hmm…I notice that this is written by a PETA associate. PETA is known for notoriously high kill rates. And, furthermore, this article is factually incorrect, as studies show that feral/semi-feral cats in colonies can have similar quality (and span) of life to indoor cats. I’ve personally seen several outdoor cats live 10+ years, and one who died of natural causes at the ripe age of 18.

  • Anna Bartels

    Good article that addresses many issues of feral or outdoor cats. Wildlife has NO chance when there is any cat around be it a TNR cat or other. As a wildlife rehabilitator, most of my animal patients are cat injured or caught. The majority of victims die. It is sooo sad to have pieces of a bird or turtle torn off their body and someone (who owns the cat or says it is a TNR cat) says, can you fix this? You cry and scream inside when you see the torn body of the victim and it is still alive. Cats are hunters and killers and very detrimental to all small wildlife. Cats also face getting hit by cars, coyotes prey on them quite a bit. many TNR cats cannot be retrapped as they get trap wise. It is sad when any life ends but TNR is NOT the answer. Responsible pet ownership is and keeping them indoors for safety is much more humane to them and wildlife.

  • Amy Anthony

    Global warming has been acknowledged by the science community as an explanation for unprecedented habitat alterations which then cause animal hardship. Why do the bird lovers never consider its role in changing bird populations and migratory patterns (which would make it seem like some are missing). Birds go where their sustenance is. For example, if there’s a drought, they won’t stay. Like bears and fish, they are likely struggling with environmental impacts. But their advocates routinely blame cats and want death. Very peculiar. It’s like they’ve been brainwashed.

  • Jenny

    Feral Cats are truly wild animals..and can not be kept inside the house.. they dont respond well to being “locked up” inside a house.. they actually will continuously throw themselves at windows.. trying to get out.. I had one here for a few weeks after he got fixed.. he DIDNT want to be inside.. I opend the door and he ran out as fast as he could.. I leave food and water for him.. He doesnt deserve to be put down.. he is a good kitty, just not a tame one. he would shred my hand if I tried to pet him..
    while its true that wildlife should not be attacked by these kitties.. remember, they also hunt mice, rats and other “undesirables” as well as birds and animals we dont want hunted..

  • Janie

    A huge national group like PETA, which successfully raises lots of money every year, shouldn’t be bragging about spaying/neutering an average of just 23 animals per day over the last 16 years…then gripe about the (more effective) work that others do.

  • Katherine

    I have 2 rehomed/rescue cats who are spayed who live with me. They are locked up at night (to avoid night hunting or fighting) but roam free during the day. This ‘roaming’is actually sleeping on back deck or garden. I actually think locking a cat up 24/7 is harsh and unfair. i also think that the suggestion that letting them out is cruel, is just ridiculous. My cats are both now 13 and 15 so we are doing something right.

  • Teddy Gingerich

    Properly applied, TNR is a vital part of animal care. We will never rid the world of feral cats (for whom humans are to blame), so the wisest course is to sterilize as many as possible. Killing them simply opens up a void for more unfixed animals to move into, as well as being unnecessarily cruel. By fixing (and vaccinating) a stable population, we maintain healthy animals who will not reproduce. In a perfect world, there would be no strays, as their humans would not abandon them to the fate of the streets. As for the “cats kill every wild thing they come in contact with” argument, it’s not applicable to maintained community colonies. They are fed, so they don’t have to look for food elsewhere. They are also more likely to look for food on the ground (mice and rats) – things we would rather not have around our homes. Bird populations are more impacted by climate change (which changes their food supply), encroachment into their land with buildings, and the increased use of pesticides, which kills their food supply.

    For an excellent example of properly maintained community colonies, look to The Happiest Place on Earth: Disneyland. When the park was built, workers became aware of numerous strays living in the new buildings and construction areas. Rather than try and kill them, Walt let them stay. Where there are theme parks, there is food (and trash). Where there is food, there are mice. Walt only wanted an imaginary mouse associated with his park, so the cats stayed, and the real mice weren’t a problem. Now there is a well-known colony, cared for and loved. They are given vet care, fixed as necessary (new cats show up), and if kittens are found, they are adopted out when old enough, and the mother spayed. They have a website and Instagram page as well. As I said, in a perfect world, they would all have homes. Since we humans are apparently not decent enough to NOT throw away our pets like trash, the least we can do is care for the ones we can in a humane way. Which, BTW, does not mean PETA’s “kill them all” way.

  • Apeil

    Wow. TNR is the most humane way to help feral cats, significantly decrease disease and reproduction of hard, short lives on the street, and increases their lifespan and improve health. How can you go against TNR? We can find something imperfect and negative about anything!! But to go against something that keeps shelter numbers down, helps the ferals and humans is outrageous and senseless!!!!

  • Don Schulz

    “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has warned that maintaining feral cat colonies can lead to an increase in the incidence of rabies transmission from cats to humans.” But a check of CDC data going back to 2003 shows there has not been a single case of human rabies attributed to cats, feral or otherwise.
    “One study estimates that free-roaming cats kill up to 24 billion wild animals and birds every year” but the study also states that the overwhelming majority of them are rats and mice. Tens of billions of rats and mice allowed to thrive will produce hundreds of billions of rats and mice. What “ethical treatment” does PETA have for eliminating disease-carrying rodents?

  • Eric Carr

    Killing a healthy animal is never the most ethical choice.

    Many TNR’ed cats turn out to be adoptable. The rescue program I work with (Project M.E.O.W. in West Philadelphia) saves hundreds of cats per year. My own cat Stormy was a TNR case whose trapper noticed that he was friendly enough to be put into a foster home. He’s been a wonderful companion for a few years now, and helps me socialize new foster cats that come through the system.

    TNR, along with fostering the adoptables, absolutely works, as anyone who’s spent any time in the field knows.

  • Katherine Lee

    Please read the following article with more data basis:
    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58bc48abe4b02b8b584dfcfb…
    Please read articles with enlightenment before fuming animals (aside from humans, of course) are better off dead than living where they were born. An animal born outside is not ‘abandoned’ when returned to its’ prior location. Infected with rabies? How much research have you done on this subject, exactly? Feral cats are afraid of humans. When TNR’d (also now called TNVR’d for lack of basic human understanding) means Trap-Neuter-VACCINATE-return. Feral cats are vaccinated for rabies under law at the time of their spay/neuter. Many people also have them tested for FIV and Felv before the procedure so having it in the colony is unlikely (and neither of those are transmissible to humans). The Bubonic Plague outbreak arose hundreds of years ago, when they, once again, tried killing off outdoor cats in waves, you know, out of pure ‘love’ for animals. People were infected by the rodent population explosion that carried it from fleas. If someone got it from a cat, you can thank the mouse it ate that thankfully didn’t breed in the walls of your home. Birds? Please see the above article cited. Also, there are numerous studies done where they wiped out cat populations on islands and watched disease and other populations sky-rocket out of ‘human’ control, you know, because we have to control everything. On Toxoplasmosis? Cats get infected from infected prey, you know, the ones you’re worried about ‘protecting’ from cats, although birds of prey routinely eat other birds, rodent populations haven’t suffered or been added to as many endangered species lists as all the ‘predators’ humans have been pushing to extinction. Are birds and rodents extinct in the UK, where cats have lived thousands of years? What about Asia where Asian Wildcats are from, or Africa, where African Wildcats are from, ancestors of today’s domestic housecats? There are still birds and rodents there, aren’t there?
    Now back to Toxoplasmosis, cats are only infected through eating infected prey. Cats can only give it to humans if you EAT infected material, like eating a sandwich after scooping an infected litter box and not washing your hands first. There are many other ways to get Toxopladmosis that don’t include cats. Please see the CDC’s article on the subject, officially, and please read it in its’ entirety if you want to act completely informed. Any other misleading data you want to fling around please feel free to challenge with hard, true facts. I’ll be sure to look them up.
    The truth here is, TNVR workers aren’t paid taxpayer dollars, and aren’t funded by the state like shelters are to kill animal ‘throw-aways’. They spend their own earned money sterilizing and vaccinating cats on their own, that did not ‘abandon’ because they were born outside. Many times cats are worked with for months to rehabilitate and socialize them to adopt themselves or to others. Kittens are almost always fostered and adopted out whenever possible. They are fed so thet stay healthy and are less likely to get sick and will hunt for less prey. Feeding cats does not ‘bring more cats’ if thet weren’t already out there in the first place. They don’t morph from thin air. TNVR saves space for animals needing homes in shelters without killing all others that ‘don’t fit’ in the shelter system’s capacity. TNVR has been proven to work in many cities, with ‘cooperation’ and ‘education’ of its’ many misinformed citizens. Good day to you all.

  • MRoman

    Most outdoor cats are lost or abandoned family pets and their offspring to even suggest to kill or implement feeding bans on lost and abandoned family pets speaks volumes.
    Don’t reinvent the wheel – Education is a wonderful thing then we wouldn’t have to REPEAT, REPEAT, REPEAT about the success of TNR. There are excellent resources from animal organizations. Pass it on: Community Effort: Trap Neuter Return w colony management caregiver/s (caregivers evaluate new comers into the colony, if friendly, check for chips, post cat on lost & found if not claimed rehome.)
    Some free roaming cats have homes and are considered indoor/outdoor pets but the majority of outdoor cats you see or don’t see are lost and abandoned family pets and their offspring.
    Cats are trapped by an experienced trapper and evaluated. Socalized family cats that are lost and abandoned are posted on NJ lost and found pets pages and local shelters. ALL socalized cats/kittens that were not reunited with their family are put up for adoption to be rehomed. Un-socialized cats are returned to their home outdoors in the care of a community caregiver/s.

    Feeding bans don’t work, it’s inhumane to starve lost and abandoned family cats to death.
    =REUNITE, REHOME, ADOPT -TNR -NO KILL

    http://animalalliancenyc.org/feralcats/about-community-cats-tnr/

    TNR EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES-How the successful organizations got started
    http://www.neighborhoodcats.org/

    Click on TNR Handbook 2nd Edition:
    http://www.neighborhoodcats.org/resources/books-videos-more

    http://www.alleycat.org/about/history/

    TNR GRANTS
    http://www.sawanetwork.org/grant-sources.html

    http://www.state.nj.us/health/vph/animal-control/feral-cats/

    https://www.facebook.com/ASPCApro/photos/a.101497070996.101547.98324655996/10152194417395997/?type=3&theater

    http://www.state.nj.us/health/animalwelfare/images/twocat.gif

    http://www.animalalliancenyc.org/

    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/OPI/Reports_to_the_Legislature/animalwelfaretaskforcereport.pdf

    Great job Senator Greenstein! Please call or email the Senator & let her know if you approve of her bill! As per Pet Watch New Jersey: New bill affecting shelter animals introduced
    S3019 – An Act concerning the regulation of animal shelters, pounds, and other animal holding facilities, supplementing Title 4 of the Revised Statutes and chapter 9 of Title 54A of the New Jersey Statutes, and amending various parts of the statutory law.
    S3019 Establishes additional requirements for operation and oversight of animal shelters, pounds, kennels operating as shelters or pounds, and veterinary holding facilities.
    Introduced by Linda R. Greenstein, as Primary Sponsor
    2/27/2017 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Economic Growth Committee
    31 pages
    HTML Format
    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/S3500/3019_I1.HTM
    PDF Format
    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2016/Bills/S3500/3019_I1.PDF
    Please contact Senator Greenstein to offer comments and to thank her for caring about animals in New Jersey’s animal shelters!
    Her legislative page:
    http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/members/BIO.asp?Leg=329

  • Candy Niccolson

    It is unfortunate that the author of this piece distorts the facts. TNR cats are not abandoned – each cat is evaluated after spaying or neutering to see if it can be socialized and made ready for adoption. Those cats that can’t be socialized are put in a cat colony where they are feed but also vaccinated and when they get sick get vet care. This article does a disservice to all those working day and night to help this often forgotten population.

  • Marla Fyfe

    And… PETA’s euthanasia rates are over 90%. As someone in rescue, I can attest that MANY “colonies” do NOT spread rabies, many are NOT feral. I’d be happy to read an article from an organization not intent on killing

  • Edwin Lesperance

    Great to pontificate about some of the problems we face, bu what is your solution? Mass euthanasia? Massive cat shelters (that who is going to pay for)? Primary abandonment?
    You can’t see the forest for the trees. Stopping TNR will only mean more cats will be there to suffer.

  • Edwin Lesperance

    “The answer is to require that all cats be spayed and neutered, licensed, microchipped, and kept indoors.”

    And how do you propose we do that with the estimated 300,000 ferals on Oahu alone?

  • Carolyn Bibb

    Managed colonies of TNVRed cats have a place in the eco-system. Just read this link about how Ascension Island eradicated their feral cats which caused an explosion in the rat population. In turn, these rats began eating bird eggs. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/12/03/rat-explosion-threatens-sooty-terns-ascension-island-cat-cull/
    Cats are also commensal meaning that they go where humans go. Humans are an invasive species that has resulted in far more habitat loss than cats. At the end of the day we all want the same thing, fewer free roaming, unowned cats. TNVR is the only humane way to accomplish this.

  • Paul

    Watch this foster care nom. It’s terrific. https://www.youtube.com/c/KittenAcademy/live

  • Kari Riley

    Will you provide equal time to a blogger who has a varying view, Nat Geo? PETA has definite views on animal population control while those of us who have worked in the No Kill movement find there are other ways to address the issues. There are many misconceptions out there regarding feral cats. Let’s give a fair and balanced dissemination of info and show the other side.

  • Becky

    To all those saying TNR works, I say show me. The idea behind it was to get all of the cats in a colony fixed and after some number of years, due to attrition, there would be no more cats. That could be considered a success by the TNR standard. But I only hear about all of the people doing TNR. A colony with 5 cats, 50 cats. When does it ever get to 0 cats? Remember, these cats will likely die some awful death – and, no, it’s not “nature” as some would suggest. TNR in small doses – attentive caregiver, small number of cats, resources to provide vet care should the need arise – okay. Largely popular TNR as seen today has become too much of a fun hobby for some. Is there genuine intent for a colony to become zero?

  • Carole Miller

    TNR (Trap-Neuter-Return) of feral cats is humane. It is NOT DANGEROUS!!! I do not agree with Dr. Michael W. Fox, who I’ve respected, that “…TNR programs are both a threat to public safety and harmful to native wildlife. Homeless cats are wary of and avoid human contact, less a threat to public safety than what we do encounter in our daily lives. Cat predation of wildlife is grossly misrepresented in flawed scientific studies and overstated to satisfy others’ ulterior motives.

    I have TNR’d and advocated for the right to life of homeless cats for more than 40 years. They are victims of human irresponsibility. We fail to keep them out of harm’s way. We lose or abandon them. We fail to get them spayed or neutered, so they reproduce litters of kittens for whom there are not enough good homes or open hearts. They become wary to survive, and their offspring, with no human contact, are unsocialized..feral. That alone is a reason to give them life, not condemn them to death. To euthanize is to relieve suffering. Killing an innocent animal of any species other than to relieve their immediate suffering from pain of injury or illness from which they cannot recover is inhumane and should be unacceptable to all of us. It is a condemnation of us, devoid of compassion. To kill an innocent, sentient animal to relieve “potential” future suffering, as PETA advocates, is unconscionable. That same warped way of thinking could apply to us. Would you kill your children? To kill these precious animals is also abhorrent.

    I care for and deeply care about my feral colonies, my extended family. Most of you have adopted cats into your lives and family from this homeless population via a shelter, rescue group or directly off the street into your home. Meanwhile, your neighbor has lost or abandoned theirs back into the street. Sadly, it’s a revolving door…

    PETA has championed the rights of animals for decades; but their death wish and death squads for homeless cats, as well as homed pets, has made them the problem. Ingrid Newkirk and I were of like mind at one time, but she and her organization have become unhinged in their advocacy now to kill.

  • TNR Researcher

    Here is glaring proof of how, as cat-hoarders so often and mindlessly respew, “Trap-Neuter-Release is the most effective means of managing feral cat populations. In fact, it is the only proven way to do so.”

    The residents of the UK who invented TNR in the 1950’s have been relentlessly practicing that failed ideology nationwide for over 60 years now. And all they have managed to do with TNR is DOUBLE their vermin cat populations — from 4.1 million vermin cats in 1965 to 8.1 million vermin cats in 2015. (One site claims 10.5 million today!) And to help, all this time they are still killing them in shelters and legally shooting them in rural areas under their animal depredation-control laws. By foolishly hoping and praying that their very own TNR concept will reduce vermin cat populations someday they have now even driven their one and only NATIVE cat species to extinction with their invasive-species vermin “moggies” (feral house-cats) — with less than 19 “Scottish Wildcats” left in the whole world. (Along with 421 other species that they have already made extinct in the UK in the last 200 years — OVER TWO SPECIES PER YEAR GONE FOREVER just due to British cultural beliefs, practices, and values.) All the while they still insist that practicing their failed TNR policies will still save their “Scottish Wildcat” from being wiped from the earth forever. You can kiss their “Scottish Wildcat” good-bye too now because 19 individuals is not even enough RNA diversity for a viable/successful species anymore — they are already EXTINCT. (Laughably ironic if it weren’t so pathetically, globally, and permanently sad. The population of the UK have made themselves into the ecological-laughingstocks of the whole world.)

    Nice plan. TNR sure does work, doesn’t it!

    You know that saying about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The British have proved the failure of their vermin cat-insanity for over 60 years now. You too can be just as ecologically destructive, ignorant, and just as insane as the inbred mentalities of the Toxoplasma gondii brain-damaged moggie-licking British by practicing and promoting their failed-belief in their TNR concept.

    Here too are some wonderful quotes from an article published by their most revered TNR promoters — the very “scientists” that TNR imbeciles always quote out of context to try to support their TNR insanity. Read it and weep.

    “Virtually no information exists to support the contention that neutering is an effective long-term method for controlling free-roaming cat populations.”

    “Free-roaming cats do not appear to have sufficient territorial activity to prevent new arrivals from permanently joining colonies.”

    Levy, Julie K., David W. Gale, and Leslie A. Gale. “Evaluation of the Effect of a Long-Term Trap-Neuter-Return and Adoption Program on a Free-Roaming Cat Population.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2003, 222(1)

    Or these comments from Julie K. Levy’s other study::

    “In both counties, results of analyses did not indicate a consistent reduction in per capita growth, the population multiplier, or the proportion of female cats that were pregnant.”

    “Implementation of the stage-structured model suggested that no plausible combinations of life history variables would likely allow for TNR to succeed in reducing population size, although neutering approximately 75% of the cats could achieve control (which is unrealistic), a value quite similar to results in the present study.”

    Levy, Julie K; “Analysis of the impact of trap-neuter-return programs on populations of feral cats”

    Pretty damning conclusion regarding the efficacy of TNR.

    “No plausible combinations…. would likely allow for TNR to succeed…”.

    In other words – It can’t work.

  • Tamara

    Wow, just wow.
    I’m shocked how many people are just listening to the results of one article and not doing research on this before making comments . I’m shocked that the author of this article as well for not doing complete research .
    Millions of pets are euthanized every year. If you took all these cats out of an environment where someone is feeding them and try to rehome them they would end up getting euthanized. It’s sad, but true.
    TNR programs are not the best option, but in most cases it’s either that or euthanize them. Not all cats and colonies like this end up with horrible medical issues. I have attended a TNR session and it has helped in many locations where at least the animals don’t continue to reproduce and they are getting food & water.
    There is evidence to back this up and the real problem we have here is over pet population and why did these colonies get started in the first place. It’s because of irresponsible pet owners in the first place.
    Fix the problem before it begins and don’t chastise people for trying to do what ever they can to help.

  • Peter J. Wolf

    The Greatest Danger to Outdoor Cats? This Ongoing Campaign of Misinformation and Scaremongering

    Daphna Nachminovitch’s recent guest post (“TNR Is Dangerous Both to Cats and to Other Animals,” March 8) contained a number of misstatements that are likely to undermine chances for reasonable discussions on the subject of outdoor cats, thereby hampering efforts to craft sound public policy. Indeed, contrary to her various claims, the greatest danger to outdoor cats is the ongoing campaign of misinformation and scaremongering used (by PETA and others) to justify their killing in unprecedented numbers.

    Nachminovitch states, for example, that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “has warned that maintaining feral cat colonies can lead to an increase in the incidence of rabies transmission from cats to humans.” In fact, data compiled annually by CDC show that the number of cats testing positive for the rabies virus has remained essentially unchanged since 1992, despite the fact that the popularity of trap-neuter-vaccinate-return (TNVR) programs has soared over this same period. Indeed, data posted on the agency’s website reveal that, of the 49 human rabies cases reported in the U.S. since 1995, 10 were the result of dog bites that occurred outside of the U.S. while the remainder were traced either to wildlife or were of unknown origins. And according to CDC, just two cases of human rabies in the U.S. have been attributed to cats since 1960. The fact is, TNVR programs provide a significant public health benefit, vaccinating many thousands of cats who have, historically, remained largely “under the radar.” The resulting herd immunity protects the cats, of course, but also provides a barrier between wildlife and the community.

    When Nachminovitch blames outdoor cats for an outbreak of flea-borne typhus in Southern California, she fails to acknowledge other factors that might have been involved, including the area’s recent drought. More important, she fails to acknowledge the most recent data from the California Department of Public Health demonstrating that the number of flea-borne typhus cases in 2016 was the lowest it’s been in six years (just nine confirmed cases across the state) and significantly lower than the average number of cases from 2001 to 2010. Again, this dramatic reduction in flea-borne typhus cases comes alongside a considerable increase in TNVR efforts.

    Based on a handful of graphic, largely anecdotal cases, Nachminovitch claims that “leaving [cats] outside to fend for themselves” is to seal their “ghastly fate.” Evidence from large-scale, shelter-based TNVR programs tells a very different story, however: the vast majority of these cats are doing just fine. Of the nearly 2,500 cats admitted to a two-year program in one Alachua County, Florida, community, for example, only 16 (0.7%) were ineligible for the program due to health issues. And in San José, California, where more than 10,000 community cats were sterilized and returned over a four-year period as part of a shelter-based TNVR program, it was observed that “impounded feral cats are surprisingly healthy and have good bodyweight.”

    While Nachminovitch argues that TNVR is “not the answer to the homeless-cat crisis,” she fails to offer anything in the way of an alternative. In fact, it’s well understood that the “traditional” approach to managing community cats (i.e., impoundment followed, in most cases, by lethal injection), which has been used for more than 100 years in this country, has failed to produce any long-term population reduction. (Were this not the case, the current “crisis,” as Nachminovitch calls it, simply wouldn’t exist.) Shelter killing with no end in sight is not only demonstrably ineffective, it’s also wildly unpopular and costly — the poster child for failed public policy. Targeted TNVR programs, on the other hand, offer a humane, effective, and economical alternative.

    Best Friends Animal Society operates more large-scale TNVR programs than any other organization in the country. And the successes we’ve seen, in our own programs and others, echo the findings of research studies demonstrating both the effectiveness of targeted sterilization programs to stabilize and reduce the population of cats at a local level, and the broad public support such programs enjoy.

    Community cats are already out there in our neighborhoods, found virtually anywhere humans are found. TNVR programs are simply the most humane, effective, and economical response to this reality. These programs are sound public policy — better not only for the cats, but also for our public health, our animal shelter systems, and our communities as a whole.

    Peter J. Wolf
    Cat Initiatives Analyst
    Best Friends Animal Society

  • Millie Reddig

    It is my understanding that feral cats have been around forever but I never heard of them or saw any until 2008. I believe their current numbers are a human-caused problem due to so many owners not spaying/neutering and dumping and abandoning their cats. So I believe the solution should be humane and the responsibility of humans who care, not cat haters who blame the cats.

    When I became aware of a feral colony where my daughter’s house was being built, I made a commitment to them and other feral cats. These cats were probably a mixture of true ferals and cats that had been abandoned. Their home was displaced when construction began. I trapped, neutered and returned the colony of around 14. I set up a shelter and feeding station. This was next to a sheep farm so the cats took advantage of the hay stacks, mice and out buildings there. But many more than that came to my feeding station. I have trapped and fixed over 200 cats that came on my daughter’s property. No doubt the majority belonged to people.

    I agree with TNR and Alley Cat Allies’ philosophy on feral cats. The most humane answer is to TNR and allow them to live out their lives. They can survive quite well on their own, given the chance. I don’t understand why people get so upset over them killing birds – other species hunt and birds can fly, for God’s sake.

    I worry constantly about cats getting hit by cars but most of the ones I see crossing streets belong to someone. Should we start euthanizing every roaming cat?

    By spaying and neutering cats, health problems that are spread by mating and fighting are cut down. I’m not against euthanasia for sick or injured cats and have made that choice when necessary. But I believe trapping and killing every cat we see is irresponsible and was dreamed up by people who don’t want to work at a humane solution.

    I think it is wrong to make statements about feral cats being a threat to human safety. The original colony I fixed 9 years ago still run away when I put out their food and water. The only danger I can conceive of is when a cat is cornered and that would most likely only occur if their life were threatened.

    Those who are promoting blanket killing of ferals and strays need to search their hearts for their true motive – hatred and convenience are possibilities.

    As a result of my growing involvement with feral and abandoned cats, I have taken in a number of cats. They all receive vet care, excellent food and shelter. They are divided into smaller groups according to personalities and space. Some are feral, some were orphaned, some were abandoned or dumped. Half of them are in my art studio I donated to them. They have outdoor kennel space and are given free time in the yard because we put up a cat fence. They give us great pleasure with their different personalities and quirks. I can’t begin to conceive of any of them not being allowed to live.

  • Laurie Wittges

    I don’t think Daphna knows the realities of colony management & TNR.
    As someone who has been doing TNR in Idaho & Calif for over 30 years – IT WORKS!
    Yes, many of the animals die over time, some are targeted by sick, inhumane bullies, some succumb to cars and predators.
    But managed colonies work! My friend & I have personally: *Saved several friendlies who were released in colonies (rather than their owners finding a better solution),
    *We have euthanized ill cats
    *Nursed or done what was needed to save others
    *we have fostered hundreds of very adoptable kittens that were saved from being a feral the rest of their lives.

    I have seen decreases in colonies that have been successfully TNR’d and managed.

    But this thought the the colonies will magically “disappear” over time is ridiculous!
    Just as in science we are taught “water will seek it’s own level” – there will always be critters that live in the environment, it is an ecosystem.
    The colonies will maintain at a reasonable level, when a cat or two dies or goes missing there will usually be one to replace it in time. Each environment has a level of critters of all kinds that it will support. That will never change. If there aren’t feral cats then there will be an abundance of some other critters that may be less visible – but it is there none the less.
    We must be good and responsible caretakers of the earth and its inhabitants and do what we can to improve the lives of the ones that can be saved and managing the colonies for other kitties that wish to remain feral.
    In many parts of the world, they have similar situations with street dogs, homeless dogs, and feral dogs.
    tnr has been proved as the best method of controlling these populations as well.

  • JJ McKibbon

    Many, many cases of rabies in feral cats lately.

    https://www.facebook.com/rabiesferalcats/

  • LucyP

    All cats deserve a loving home. If this isn’t possible because they cannot be socialized to live with humans (as with some feral cats), a painless end is far preferable to what an existence on the streets inevitably holds: broken bones and internal hemorrhaging from attacks by predators and being hit by cars, untreated infections, lingering deaths from fatal and contagious diseases, starvation, succumbing to the elements, abuse by cruel people, and worse. I applaud PETA for taking a stand for cats’ welfare.

    • Amy Isabelle Catherine

      All cats can be socialized to live with humans. Humans just don’t try. It can take time, as in, more than a week. That’s an incredibly inaccurate, ignorant statement. TNR sucks, I agree., but the answer isn’t to bounty hunt cats and murder them. The answer is to create a responsible, educated society that knows how to care for animals, before we continue breeding more for pet stores etc. If we can’t take care of the ones on the streets, then we have no business having ANY.

  • amydonovan

    No one wants to euthanize an animal, but sometimes there are worst things than a painless, peaceful death. Feral cats do not die of old age. They have hard lives full of starvation, danger and fear. As a cat lover, I would want cats to have humane dignified deaths, rather than suffer years of hunger, freezing weather, injuries, disease, and painful or violent deaths.

  • Kimmarie

    For me, this sentence says it all: “The average life expectancy of an “outdoor cat” is about two to five years compared with 12 to 15 years for a cat who lives indoors.” If you care about cats, don’t support TNR.

  • Gail Mihocko

    Thank you, PETA, for a realistic description of the plight of our seriously overabundant outdoor cat population. I have been running a cat shelter for over 15 years and have witnessed first-hand the horrors to cats and wildlife via the practice of trap-neuter-release. I have seen the horrors of hoarding situations resulting in intense cruelty and suffering because people are constantly led to believe that humans should avoid euthanizing cats at all costs.

    Domestic cats, Felis catus, are not wildlife and are not native anywhere on earth. They are domesticated just like dogs and farm animals and should not have unfettered freedom on the landscape. They should be kept as pets on one’s property and provided lifelong care.

    For people who think feral cats should be allowed to litter the landscape rather than being euthanized, where is your empathy for all the birds, small mammals, reptiles and insects they will maim and kill? An overabundance of outdoor free-roaming cats seriously upsets the balance between native prey and predators – fox, hawks, owls who also now need to compete with cats for the same prey.

    TNR is a terribly unbalanced effort to control cat populations by people who apparently have no understanding of wildlife populations or just don’t care.

    As director of a cat shelter, I love having cats around, as do our compassionate adopters, but we have a strict policy of keeping them indoors, in catios, or leash-walked. That way we can be responsible pet owners while still respecting our beautiful and necessary wildlife.

  • Gina Davis

    Go PETA! TNR is the worst thing to ever happen to cats and wildlife. Cats suffer short, harsh lives on the street and while they battle the elements, dart through traffic, get chased by dogs, and succumb to diseases they continue to harass and kill local wild animals who are struggling to survive human encroachment and environmental destruction. No one wins by leaving homeless cats in a chronic state of homelessness. I am a strong opponent of trap-neuter-abandonment programs for domestic felines, and am thankful that there is a strong, sane organization educating people on the issue. PETA always stands up for all animals!!

    • TheBride

      What is worse….they chop off the ear tip (for no reason that benefits the neutered cat) and send them back into the streets with less hearing acuity–JUST the defense mechanism that stands them apart from their prey! Horrible.

  • Chris Smith

    A rational conclusion. The proponents of TNR depend on alternative facts to further their agenda.

  • Sandra B Hoover

    Bravo for PETA. Ignore the fact that TNR doesn’t work – check out the good studies enumerated by Peter Marra in Cat Wars – cats should be kept indoors for their health. Feral cats are a huge vector for Toxoplasmosis gondii, a horrible parasite that reproduces in the intestines of cats. The eggs are carried in the feces and spread from there. Children can be infected with one exposure. The neurological damage can range from blindness to schizophrenia, and possibly ADHD and other problems. Some populations of cats showed a majority were infected with Toxo. We need to stop this building epidemic which can be handled by eliminating outdoor ranging cats.

  • Yvretta Carus

    TNR advocates used to say, “TNR can eliminate cat colonies.” Now they say, “TNR works” without defining “works.” As mentioned in this thread, TNR has been practiced for over 60 years with no evidence (only anecdotes) that TNR eliminates cat colonies.
    Let’s do an experiment. Find two cat colonies in the same city, comparable size, comparable setting. Trap all cats in both colonies. Neuter and return all the cats in one colony. Remove all cats from the other colony, and make sure that no cat food is available in the vacated colony site. (What you do with the removed cats depends on how many cat-lovers are willing to relocate feral cats to their fenced private yards.) Census both colony sites every year for 10 years. Replicate in several other cities. Then we will have some data on TNR’s effectiveness in eliminating a cat colony.

  • Ka

    It’s certainly possible that you’re correct regarding a few isolated and horrific instances. However, the overwhelming evidence is that TNRM (you keep forgetting the “M”) is the only humane and proven method to reduce feral cat overpopulation and suffering. Please see this excellent discussion: http://voices.nationalgeographic.org/2017/03/10/big-love-for-small-cats/

  • Angel Reed

    I agree that adopting cats and then putting them outside is dangerous and negligent, but what about TNR for stray cats who seem to be too feral to catch/rescue/socialize? What’s the best thing to do for them?

    • End Trap Neuter Return TNR

      Cat sanctuaries.

  • Janet Williams

    I can speak from experience that this article is totally untrue, at least in our case here in Marin. My nonprofit, Marin Friends of Ferals, works closely with the Marin Humane Society. We have TNR’ed over 2500 cats in the last 12 years. We do not and never would release cats without daily food, water and shelter. We have dedicated volunteers and Marin residents who care for our sterilized ferals. Many of the cats are over 10 years old because of the care they receive. Not all people and feral cat groups believe it’s humane to practice TNR without feeding and caring for the cats. So I think this article did an injustice to the hundreds of people dedicated to humanely reducing feral cat populations and it only adds to the incorrect belief by some that feral cats have no purpose simply because they aren’t lap cats. This was a very one-sided opinion that only served to spread more misinformation about a humane and effective alternative to euthanizing perfectly healthy animals., provided the cats are fed daily.

  • Manchester United Wilson Hemmatröja

    Hi there, after reading this awesome paragraph i am also glad to share my knowledge here with friends.

    Bayern Munich Alonso Hemmadräkt

  • Dusty

    It’s not Re-abandon!

    As a feral cat, I take much umbrage at this highly offensive article. I happen to enjoy being alive, I am clean, healthy and well taken care of and Ms. Nachminovitch has done nothing but a disservice to my class of cat with her misguided and targeted comments and links that ultimately bolster the position that all feral cats should be killed—how unoriginal-though the attempt is worth of a brief nod for the opening paragraph. We’ve heard this argument before in various other persuasive, craftily worded articles with good grammar that aim to convince the world-that feral cats are responsible for the decline of public health in the modern world-yes let’s blame everything on the feral cat—let’s stop and think a bit more carefully about this from my perspective as my lot has been dealing with this for a very long time.
    I was born to an outdoor cat who was not spayed or neutered—all on both sides can agree that yes the mother cat SHOULD have not sterilized—but she was NOT – and therein lies the root of the problem—HUMANS! Now, I do not advocate for the erasure of the human who was too busy, or too lazy, or too uncaring to take proper care of the cat, for as we all know, there are plenty of good ones—and it wouldn’t be fair to lump them all into the same category, so dump lump me into the same category. I happen to have a home now -I got lucky, but many of my family remain on the streets and that is the life they know, and it’s not all bad.
    The search for an easy answer through a feel-good scratch of an article from Ms. Nachminovitch is never going to solve the problem either because it’s not possible because you can’t catch all of us—so if you don’t TNR [btw it’s TRAP NEUTER RETURN (to managed colony where we came from) NOT TRAP NEUTER RELEASE and abandon], and you don’t do anything, there will be more and more of us. While we appreciate the kind thoughts that Ms. Nachminovitch has toward the suffering of the free-roaming cat—and there are certainly instances where euthanizing is warranted—killing all of us won’t help those who are suffering because it removes our right to life, our right to be and exist, and, we are here and there and everywhere; and there is no humane way to euthanize me because once you trap me I will be scared to death and then likely stuck in a cold room in an underfunded shelter at full capacity full of other scared-to-death ferals and it will be a horrible and terrifying death – so let’s get real about rounding us all up and “euthanizing” us because you, and the audience you serve are certainly not going to do it because let’s face it: people are very busy on facebook voicing their opinions (over and over again), and sitting on their behinds writing blogs, while the TNR people and the caring rescue groups bust theirs trying to help us—we don’t need more patronizing know-it-all activists who insist on promulgating unverified knowledge that’s not even theirs, or who brag about their numbers, but don’t tell us their euthanasia rate. They aren’t helping the situation—even this article won’t help the problem …yes, cats should be in loving homes but the reality is there aren’t enough of them… so what actions do we want to see to bring about the change in the feral cat population and who will do the job? TNR is the only humane solution at this point. But, humanely euthanizing – who is going to trap and then spend money to gently and lovingly kill a feral cat? Not many people. As I note above the likely outcome is the local shelter and if you are lucky maybe a compassionate humane society. Resources are always an issue for the humane caretakers and the humans who hate us and want us gone won’t bother with a humane method of eradication.
    Every cat blamer quotes the Smithsonian article never once givig a fair shake to the other side ..cats are one of the most 100 invasive species – doesn’t that mean there’s 99 others?! I’m a cat and I can count on one paw better than most humans! Cats kill more creatures than whatever, like 24 billion or something? Who came up with that number (who cares), and isn’t it always prefaced with the word “estimated”?! Never mind that human development, wind energy, air travel, pollution, lack of food contribute to the decline of birds—if the cats are killing a certain bird in your neighborhood stop complaining and go out and sterilize us! Here’a link to a really good article on some really bad science https://www.alleycat.org/resources/the-wisconsin-study-bad-science-costs-cats-lives/. But no, let’s quote more research (it’s where the real money is); let’s ..yawn.. talk about tracking data–stop tracking and start trapping—TNR that is! Never mind that birds carry toxoplasmosis – go to the CDC website (you are better than research than I am) if you don’t believe me, or that you can get it from not cooking your meat, that you can get it from your pet cat that may go outside, or that other animals carry it too. Never mind that other wildlife have fleas, or kill other animals, or eat everything—hint…the opossum—and, I venture to say, they may even kill more animals than cats do (they eat ticks too which is really good). Never mind that we kill rodents so you don’t have to go out and poison your home and neighborhood; we are pretty useful creatures, the untouchables of the cat world that have served a purpose for so long, so much so that now rescues and advocates are finding us work as barn cats and such other opportunities that may come our way for making a living. Not always idea situations but at least they care enough to do something.
    Then, there are the positive social aspects that we bring—for every one of you that can come up with an excuse or one of your “educated” reasons (once upon a time a millennia ago I heard about a neighborhood kid that got toxoplasmosis blah boring blah), there is someone or some group of people that will come together as a community, become friends, adopt out the kittens and try to find a way to help the cats and all the other critters around them – love of animals is a common and binding thread that time and again benefits and engages a community in working together toward common goals.
    Having a feral cat colony that is 100% fixed can be done, but like all other life forms, where there is food there will be someone to eat it and they all follow each other and the food, so yes life in all forms will continue on and there will always be new faces, just like humans. For a colony to be managed you have to have a manager. Colonies aren’t doomed to fail, that is a false argument, once managed they are more likely to succeed than fail—you just have to have a willing participant who won’t give up. And, once you have done it, as my human, has, you know it’s working—it’s always the people who’ve never tried or attempted it that say it’s doomed to fail – the amount of baby cats that are not born due to sterilizing is staggering but the cat blamers would never quote those number because it would give credence to TNR advocates and practitioners of medieval –style cat hating generally don’t do that.
    For example, key words here again from Ms. Nachminovitch are “And feeding cats also promotes abandonment, since people are more inclined to abandon their cats if they believe that someone else will “take care of” them.” What does this have to do with cats? She is, once again, talking about the failings of humans, not cats. Sure, it can happen but that doesn’t mean you have to round us up and kill us.
    Ms. Nachminovitch adds insult to injury when she cites an article about a man in Oregon who was diagnosed with bubonic plague after being bitten by a cat who was allowed to roam outdoors….. it was from his own cat – not a feral! From her own link to the CBS story: “Gaylord contracted the disease when he tried to pull a mouse out of the mouth of his cat, Charlie, because it was choking on the rodent.” Talk about a spin, I guess if you can’t come up with real facts to back up the case against homeless cats just throw the odd domestic pet cat in – the audience won’t notice as they’ve drunk the kool aid already and the article is getting too long for them.
    How about the reference to the typhus outbreak that “may have been” brought on by feral cats. In a link to the article she quotes it states: “Typhus infections occur when a person is bitten by the fleas or lice that carry the Rickettsia typhi or Rickettsia prowazeki bacteria. These pests live on feral animals, including rats, cats, skunks, raccoons and opossums.” Stay away from your backyards people, you might get typhus.
    Oh and by the way, you are pretty unlikely to catch rabies from a feral cat as we don’t let humans touch us and if we are sick we stay away from everyone. The likelihood of contracting rabies from a cat is so rate to not even be definable – again. Here’s another link for you: https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/exposure/animals/wildlife_reservoirs.html.- Also, TNR, frequently referred to as TNVR (TRAP-NEUTER-VACCINATE-RETURN) includes a rabies vaccine for the cat, so they go back to their colonies protected.
    This article is an opinion and everyone is entitled to one, but this is not deserving of National Geographic or any true animal advocate. Winning the war on animal cruelty won’t come with euthanizing all ferals, it’s gotta be done on a one-on-one basis, it’s not for the lazy, it’s not a quick fix and it doesn’t have one solution .. if only someone could come up with something creative and constructive – wait we have it, it’s called TNR, and it’s called love. This vaguely written article is smellier than a can of tuna on trapping night and I’m not going into this trap and neither should you. That being said, I’ve voiced my opinion, I’m going to post it, cough up a big hairball and take a well-earned nap.

    • Cat_Control

      Well Dusty – interesting to see you writing in the third person. Whilst amusing and lends it’s self to a cartoon it does not contain useful information.

      To reply to your assertions would simply be talking at you not with you, so instead I offer Scientific America

      https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/worst-invasive-predators/

      The only truth here is exponents of TNR are well meaning but misguided.

  • Hilary Entley

    YES YES YES!!!!!!! As a huge supporter of wildlife rehabilitation, we see the problems these invasive species make!!!! These cat people are sick in the head to not see the problems! Blinded by their own agenda!

    • Amy Isabelle Catherine

      Invasive species? Are you seriously this numb? Cats are not an invasive species. They are animals that humans wanted as pets, but HUMANS are grossly irresponsible, ignorant, abusive, lazy and cruel. WE CREATED THIS PROBLEM!!?! And You are a perfect example of the problem. Ignorance is where it all begins. Cats are not some insect eating crops that people live off of. They are freaking house pets that humans have abandoned responsibility for on such a massive scale that they are now living outside, sometimes in colonies, simply trying to survive and suffering through a horrible, lonely existence. Have some basic human compassion or grow some brain cells, please. Why not get off your butt and HELP save an animal instead of pass the buck and label anyone who gives a crap as ‘sick in the head’.

  • Pamela

    This blog post is riddled with half truths that jump from fear mongering to tear jerk outrage. Its a mean trick to piecemeal & juxtapose the imagery of violence against animals against TNR. There is no TNR agenda- colony caretakers aren’t asking you for your money…cough cough…and there’s no vigilante justice against sociopaths who harm the weak. The fact is that we share this world with creatures who deserve a good quality of life. What Daphna’s solution would be is to TRAP-KILL–this doesn’t seem a far leap from the people who poison cats on the street. In reality, killing all of the cats is pointless and creates a vacuum effect that draws other animals living nearby.
    Sadly, feral cats are not adoptable- they were never abandoned and aren’t domesticated in the way that dogs are. A FERAL cat isn’t able to be socialized in the way that a STRAY dog or cat might be rehabbed. People’s lack of accountability is why these cats are on the street in the first place, so humans should be responsible for making it right again, not in one grand sweeping gesture of eradication but rather in a sustainable and thoughtful approach. When a cat is TNR’d, they are Neutered, Vaccinated for Felv/FIV/Rabies, treated for parasites/fleas, and any injuries. Post op, they’re taken to a safe space for healing and then returned back to their natural territory, which may be YOUR backyard, learn to share. Many caretakers provide winter shelters, clean water, and food. Their lives won’t be enriched by trying to force your ideal of a cat-less street. The world wouldn’t be a better place, the psycho’s who throw acid on cats will still throw acid. Please do your own research and find your own truths. There’s also a beautiful documentary called “Kedi” about the cats of Istanbul and their relationship with the city. There can be a balance.

    • Evelynn Bajana

      AGREE 💯 thank you Pamela!

      • Chavena Hernandez

        Agree also 100% ! Thank you for the great response Pamela!
        And for my 2 cents, as PETA is now known for their extreme cases of killing animls that are domesticated & are pets…
        I cannot believe that they or anyone in the workings of PETA, as this aurthor is, could have any form of true understanding of the real & proven benefits of TNR as per their admitted NON belief in a animals “Right to Life” Policy.
        Thank you for your great reponse Pamela! 100% agreed!

  • Yorks Tong

    I understand your point of view, but I am still waiting for the best solution. As Inwas reading through, I was hoping to see a better idea in the end of the passage. It’s easy to point out something doesn’t work, but without giving a suggestion of an alternative it is just as unhelpful. I think TNR only isn’t enough, but it may be a part of a better and more successful way to control the situation. Cats sterilzed or not hunt birds and squirrels, so do other wild animals.

  • Janet

    There are some very happy ferals with outdoor shelters provided by kind people and food and attention to them in case of illness.

    Peta should work on changing the justice system to harshen the punishment for any animal abuse.

    Also , tax laws must be reformed to banefit animal Care by proof and possible audit visits.

    Shelters must up their services and provide free spay and neuter to poor people.

  • Jamie S

    This article is, first, noted at the bottom as the blogger’s opinion, so I want to remind everyone that this is NOT something National Geographic is saying they agree or disagree on.

    TNR programs do a lot of good work in communities, though. Sure, there are going to be some instances of illness and injury. Many of the cases cited in this blog, though, are human cruelty, not shortcomings of TNR. Properly managed colonies are an excellent way to SAVE LIVES of cats who would likely be put down in shelters. On the whole, there are still more shelters that kill for space or for illnesses that are deemed too expensive to manage. Many of these feral cats, if taken to a traditional shelter, would be in exactly that place. The idea of TNR is NOT to abandon them but to have caretakers, and TNR programs seek out new caretakers when others leave/become unable to take care of the animals. The other thing that’s important to note is that many of the cats rescued through TNR programs do get adopted out. Cats that are friendly and able to adapt to being indoors are often put up for adoption rather than released. And the only true alternative to TNR, if you’re concerned about population control? PETA would be on board (which is why you shouldn’t ever cite them)… The option when shelters are full and there aren’t enough people adopting cats is that these cats get put down. This author, without SAYING IT out right, is essentially advocating for murdering the cats sooner than later, rather than giving them a chance at a happy life.

  • Suzanne Goll

    In our county Animal Control does not enforce the laws which require cats to be kept on ones property, contained in a separate area if in heat, abandoned. Reasons are insufficient resources and difficulty in enforcing; lack of leadership. Animal Control in our county also does not go out and trap free roaming cats nor answer most complaint calls. Citizens are left to deal with all this themselves. I can see all sides. What is most clear to me is that if the county you are in is not going to part take in a solution, then the citizens are left to do it themselves. For me any action is better than no action.Many people will leave a cat outside to live and reproduce before they ever trap it and bring it to Animal Control to be euthanized. But if they can get the cat TNRd they will do something which is huge – stops the reproduction etc. Also a great thing about TNR is that done right it involves education and outreach…Education and outreach into homes where cats are…living… so they can be spayed– an unfixed cat will always wind up kicked outside due to behavioral issues. Anyway, if the county you live in does nothing then I think offering ALL solutions is best… because as you all know some people will never do TNR and some will never euthanize. I do agree that pet cats belong inside…. and ideally if there were unlimited funds, ferals could be neutered and contained in large fenced in beautiful places so wildlife was not harmed… but that is not viable.

  • Fred Hammes

    I work in TNR also.
    I do not, as implied in the article, “trap/neuter and abandon.”
    I can’t argue with you and your program. I do dispute much of the misinformation in the article. Managed TNR’d colonies are much healthier. They are fed. They are vaccinated. They are monitored for cats that need medical treatment. Newly dumped kitties can be trapped and altered. Kittens and dumped pets can be fostered and sent to adoptions. They do tend to keep their territory.
    The article does not acknowledge the “vacuum effect” when cats are removed from a territory with resources to support them.
    The massive numbers of “wildlife” that cats are cited to kill do, indeed, include all the mice and rats that barn cats are employed to control.
    It is, indeed, possible to spay/neuter entire colonies and keep them managed and healthy. They can, indeed, live active, happy lives with their families in the places that they’ve always called home, or in barn homes where they’ve been relocated to with proper protocol.
    Suggesting that killing every cat that can not be adopted into a family home is the best thing for all cats is asinine.
    That kind of misinformation is what I dispute.

  • benjamin isaac

    You are aware that cats kill all our birds and wildlife and if this keeps going all the birds and wildlife will be extinct, and extinct is forever. Why don’t people put this together ?
    We have to get rid of the cats, there is no other choice.
    There is a way to get rid of the outside cats.
    What we have to do is offer a bounty for every dead cat. then you’re going to see all kinds of hunters come out of the woodwork , and you’re going to see the cats numbers decline.
    and this will make the cat owners happy for their cats will be safe and inside, where there supposed to be. this will also eliminate the diseases from outside cats.
    Thank you for your time.
    Benjamin Welk Isaac

    • Amy Isabelle Catherine

      A bounty on cats? You are a prime example of the ignorance I discussed in my comment above. Ridiculous.

  • Deblr

    From what I’ve come to understand thru the years is that PETA doesntg believe any animals shouuld be kept as pets or in zoos. So of course they don’t believe in TNR. I’ve helped with TNR groups in my neighborhood and they don’t abandon cats . They come back and put out food , shelters , provide vet care when needed. I think PETA should stay out of it . Just like there opinion on Greyhound racing . Most Greyhound are better treated ,cared for and spoiled more than a lot of people i know treat there own kids . And thats a fact. Im sure there are bad people in the Greyhound industry just like there are bad puppy mills in yards and garage all over the US. But don’t condemn a whole group because of one bad one .

  • Edward

    WOW You do have a problem in your country. I have read through a lot of replies and there is a consistent theme of a supreme right to life for cats.

    Well meaning people who’s only focus is to return cats so they can live out their lives. What is a stand out failure here is the notion that artificially supporting TNR colonies with food is contributing to stable colonies that reduce populations over time.

    The aim of TNR is to reduce populations over time. An argument against a kill solution is the vacuum effect. The logic is destroyed by providing food that can only have the effect of increasing the feral population and maintaining the hope or worse preaching that this will reduce a feral cat population.

    Then there is the guilt argument – the problem exists because humans did it! There is also the rodent argument! Both of these situations are false arguments that cannot justify the existence of artificially supported feral cat populations.

    Your feral cat population is suffering from overpopulation and must be growing exponentially. The problem as I see it is being able to distinguish between companion cats and all other – abandoned, feral and unowned cats.

    Consistent laws and regulations are needed. All companion cats to be registered, chipped, neutered and contained on the owners property. All feral,stray, abandoned and unowned cats removed from public places with a revamped TNR policy. Trap Neuter & re-home.

    This radical solution would probably take 100yrs. So unfortunately the powerful cat lobby will prevail until the problem is so dire that federal intervention is the only solution.

    In Australia we also have our problems but fortunately the Federal Government is showing some leadership and implementing a national plan for companion cats and all other cats.

    At this time the voices for TNR are louder than the voices removal. Good luck with your problems.

    • Amy Isabelle Catherine

      Um, sorry, but the guilt argument? Really? We DID DO THIS. It’s not an argument or a question. Unless you’re saying some alien civilization flew down here and created the gigantic population of homeless cats (and dogs)? We did it. We are responsible for it. They are not rodents. They are animals that WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE TAKING CARE OF and we, as a society, have failed miserably. Please grasp reality.

  • Michael White

    I think what people who raise this hysteria about cats ignore, is that there is no evidence cited to support that the assertion that cat population is worse today. To the contrary, there is lots of data to show that decades of spay/neuter have reduced the pet population and the number of cats. We used to euthanize 10 million cats and dogs every year just thirty years ago, when the population was lower than it is today. Free-roaming cats are guaranteed to breed and they produce 80-90% of all of the kittens born in any given year. My city killed around 20,000 cats per year for multiple years from 2008 to 2010. It was not until we passed an ordinance to manage feral cats through TNR in 2008, opened a high volume/low cost spay/neuter clinic in 2009 and passed mandatory spay/neuter of all pets over four months of age that we reduced the number of nuisance cats being turned into the shelter. We’ve had 70 years of trying to euthanize pets to to control their numbers and sterilization is the one method that actually reduces cat populations.

  • Victoria

    It is a community effort and not everyone in the community cares about the feral and abandoned cat.
    When I began TNR I saw so many killed and abused by the cat haters in the neighborhood and so many getting killed in the street that I secured them all – as many as I could.
    I have 33 feral cats living in confinement behind cat fences. When I moved, I re-trapped my TNR colony(s) and moved them with me. No small feat, I assure you. Huge price tag.
    So far my numbers have stayed about the same, some die from disease, new ones come in. I work in the community to get dogs and cats off the street and into shelters.
    Some mindsets toward these lovely creatures and their value and need for care appalls me. I am constantly trying to educate. Those who work tirelessly and with sincere intent do a great job keeping the feral cat community healthy. And TNR-abandon is still in my opinion better than nothing. Even for the wild and feral, being fixed helps them face a lot less problems while out there.
    Where support is needed, there is often only criticism and labelling. If that is all one has to offer, then that one needs to shut up or donate/time, money/food/vetcare….
    I don’t have time to read all the article or the comments, but last week in my community I rescued four dogs, loving little animals on their way to a shelter; what did you do??? What are you doing????

    • Connie Porter

      Bravo Victoria! My sentiments exactly! I too rescue homeless cats and it is by no means as simple as the article’s suggestions.

  • Victoria

    Now that I have read the article and a lot of the comments, I would like to add that I agree with Debra Hoffmann. Cats do not decimate wildlife. I was so surprised when I read an article in the local paper about squirrel season. Men can kill them but let a cat kill even one and the cats decimate the population. In both areas where I have lived with the cats, birds ate/eat freely from the cat dishes and no cat has ever touched them.

    There is no consistency because I have found from one state to the next the vets have differences of opinion on putting animals down. And euthanizing then in a safe quiet place doesn’t happen. They are killed in front of each other and that is not humane, that is inhuman.

    If TNR can’t trap and fix them all what makes the other party think they can kill them all?

    If you have lived and worked and fed colonies then you know the cat is not the danger everyone makes it out to be. There is a lot of exaggeration on the part of those who want them dead.

    I rescue animals by default. They are there, I do what I can to help them. It takes willingness to do what is in front of you. I suppose that willingness comes from a level of compassion and a belief that all life is sacred.

    Thanks.

    Thanks.

    • Tracy

      I enjoyed reading your comment and agree with what you said! It’s bad enough when people make the false claim that cats are destroying wildlife (birds, in particular); but when it’s a city government making that claim, it’s so much worse! There was a year-long battle with the little town next to mine who wanted the cats who resided (and was cared for) in a city park. The main EXCUSE the city government claimed was that the cats were hurting the exotic bird populations we have here in Florida. And of course, since the city claimed it, then it must be true, right? Smh But let me tell you, all of the cat haters jumped right on that bandwagon! It was already against the law to feed the cats in the park for years! (Not that it stopped me or a few other people.) The irony is that if we had stopped feeding the cats, they would have been a lot more likely to kill birds for food.
      But seriously, how ridiculous is it that the city would cater to a few people who lived around the park who didn’t like cats (and I’m literally talking about 3 people!) instead of protecting the lives of a few dozen living, breathing, feeling beings? Just an FYI, sure there were several truly feral cats, but there were also multiple cats who were “dumped” there by irresponsible people. Originally the city was going to trap & euthanize all of the cats. That’s what started that year long battle. When it was all said and done, we lost the battle to allow the cats to stay in the park. (Except for one very small side where a woman had been caring for & performed TNR on the cats for approximately 20 years!) The city allowed the rest of the cats to be trapped and removed (supposedly to be relocated) by a few different rescue organizations. I’m just happy they weren’t killed! Unfortunately, fast forward 2 years and I discovered where 20 of the cats landed. They were “living” in a one room building, waiting for relocation efforts to come to fruition, which took an additional 6-8 months! That made me incredibly sad. Sure, someone came to feed them and change their litter boxes daily, but they were living a miserable existence!
      What I always found interesting is the fact that, besides the cats, there are also

  • Kellie Beckett

    I, too have been involved in TNR for the past year. It has been a pretty successful experience to help these special critters have and live healthier, happier lives in the place they know as their home. For months before I began working with the SPCA TNR program and only ONE neighbor near a clinic where I work, there were tiny piles of sick, rotting, dying kittens and cats too weak to eat or move. We have been able to TNR over the course of one year-32 cats and kittens, vaccinate and feed twice-three times daily, provide medical attention, affection and fresh water. The numbers have decreased by nature but the suffering has been brought to a near halt. Some do catch and die from URI but none are starved, they have people who care for them and mourn loss when one passes on due to illness (common to all cats). It is most sad when some feel killing is the answer. Animal population is OUR responsibility and should be shared. I added none to the population of the feral colony I help feed,care for and protect. I get much love in return. Yes, it can be expensive feeding 30 plus cats a day but the alternative is watching them suffer one by one at the hands of humans who would rather execute than take responsibility for their health and well being. I am not ashamed of caring. I would, however, be ashamed to kill intentionally. Killing is not within my heart. Step up. Just because an animal is not inside a home does not mean it isn’t cared for, medically, physically or emotionally. Much fewer feral colony cats suffer than what we are led to believe. I see proof of that every day. Become a part of the solution.

  • liz hernandez

    Humans become equally responsible for the overpopulation of cats commonly known as strays or ferals when not taking responsibility for spay/neutering of their own pets & then allowing them to roam, especially during mating season. Yet we hold these cats responsible for being cats & for what doing what is natural to them as animals, which is eat, sleep, breed.

    So yes, we humans indirectly contribute to the continued increase in populations in our communities at often times, epidemic proportions. We watch from a distance & then hate them as if it’s all their fault for being here.

    All I’ve read here are complaints without solutions. These cats are HERE & they are THERE! How about community team work and compassion for cats who are in need of help & management of their colonies so that no more kittens are born. Ferals can be spayed/neutered for FREE!! It’s the first step in reducing populations so there is no excuse for allowing populations to increase.

    Obviously, those who commented, care. How about forming neighborhood support groups to educate & help prevent problems & concerns put forth here? That person feeding is not your enemy. These cats are not your enemy. Both need your help, compassion, & support. Not your resentment & often times, hatred. Isn’t there enough of that in the world?

    I get the sense that some of you want to help but don’t want to deal with backlash for being that person who is out there on the frontlines. To those of you who truly care… be that person & make a difference. You’re efforts are courageous & could be life changing.

    • Penny Branham

      Im one of those. Been involved for years now. Have 11 at home, some former ferals. Also have two 12 year old TNR colonies. The cats love to see me and the other caregivers…they get food, shelter and if necessary, medical care. Some have become tame. It has worked here….it is supposed to be done knowing the colonies have csregivers in place. My group networks. If one can’tfeed and monitor, another takes their place. I have never heard of TNR-ignore before this article

    • JJ McKibbin

      TNR is not a feral cat population reduction plan. TNR is nothing more than a euthanasia avoidance scheme that keeps cats in the environment in perpetuity. There is a plan that will work, because it attacks both sides of the equation.

      Start by cutting off the source of feral cats, which is owned pet cats.

      1) Require licensing, micro-chips & collar tags for all owned pet cats.
      2) Require mandatory spay/neuter of all owned pet cats.
      3) Require containment of all owned pet cats (No free-roaming). Fine violators with progressively increasing fines.

      At the same time, take meaningful steps to reduce the feral cat population.

      1) Ban feeding of feral cats. Fine violators with progressively increasing fines.

      2) Ban re-dumping of neutered cats (TNR). Cat advocates can still trap and save cats. Kittens can still be pulled and adopted to indoor homes. A large percentage of free-roaming street cats are actually strays, not feral, and are suitable for adoption to indoor homes. These cats can also be adopted to indoor homes. For the truly feral cats, each cat advocate can save several of them in enclosures on their own property if they wish to do so. If each cat advocate would do this, a significant number of cats could be saved. If enclosed sanctuary space is available some feral cats could go there also. But no re-dumping of cats. Any that can’t be placed in one of the above options should be euthanized.

      3) Require shelters that are contracted with the city to accept all cats. If citizens are willing to trap feral cats they must have a shelter to take them to.

      4) Eliminate or greatly reduce the required hold time for cats at the shelter. Since all owned cats will be required to be micro-chipped and collar-tagged, they can be quickly reunited with their owners. Shelters can still hold unidentified cats for adoption for as long as they want if they have space available, but they will be able to euthanize feral cats or cats they don’t have space for immediately. This will reduce costs greatly.

      5) Use Animal Control to remove large and/or particularly troublesome groups of feral cats and to remove cats for which complaints have been received.

      6) Encourage citizens to live-trap free-roaming cats on their property and take them to the shelter. Use public service announcements, the town website, and other social media to inform citizens about the diseases spread by cats and the death and destruction they cause to native wildlife so that they understand why cats should be removed.

      7) Post signs at parks and other locations stating that abandoned cats will be trapped and potentially euthanized. Post this same information on the town website and other social media. People will be far less likely to abandon cats if they know they may be euthanized.

      8) Encourage citizens to report large colonies of cats and people feeding feral cats. The vast majority of people don’t like living around large groups of free-roaming cats.

      9) Require individuals and business to contain garbage so that it is not accessible to cats.

  • End Trap Neuter Return TNR

    Thank you for spreading the word! We need more publicity for the hard working folks of cat sanctuaries. There are alternatives to T-N-R! It begins with responsible cat ownership and educating the public.

  • altgirl35

    Right on! Enough is enough!

  • TheBride

    I am appalled at the practice of cutting of a part of the cat’s beautiful (and very important) ear tip. This ruins their acute hearing–yet they send them back. Tattoo them where it isn’t seen! And I’m sure many people have lost beloved cats because some TNR fanatic has trapped them whilst they enjoy a day-time foray into the neighborhood park. I don’t like what people are doing with cats to “protect” them.

  • barbara brandt

    cats were abanded and became aware of these insane trap and release nightmare. Neighbors had no interest. I have cats so they came to my house. It was one of our coldest winters and 4 kittens arrived with their mom. Inside they came. they are here now and I am going to get them fixed and get them homes. How I do not know. I have no faith in my local pound since living here 14 year and learning not only about the dozens of people here that abandon animals. Lots of animal cruelty for cats. dogs are more fortunate and I turn to those neighbors for advice. So now I want to make sure that the male cats (many of the homeless animals are males) are neutered. They wander around and look for females. The females not in heat are usually young cats and have no idea where they come from. I never knew about this but it is really heart breaking. I live in Social Security so it is a challenge. If I was younger and had my good job, I would immediately take action to go to a vet and have these animals spayed like I did my own cats. I have adopted rescued dogs over the years and so I am not new to this but had no idea that trap and release (phoney??) does not show up when they say they will and evidently has some sort of grant. SPCA should make sure that they do not give money to anyone without proof that they are spending the money as it is supposed to be spent. I will never call them again. They did not come and the female got pregnant. Today I am hoping the no kill rescue near my home will take at least two of these kittens. Meanwhile, I am trying to get in touch with one of the groups I learned about that like myself, ended up taking care of homeless animals and finds them homes. Have to mention that one business near me has been taking care of cats that wander into his work area. His wife responded with a part of their house to take care of 9 cats and she does this knowing most likely homes will be hard to find. I think they do find homes for some. So goodness in people that love animals is hard to destroy when some cities cannot find a solution. I am from the West Coast of the U.S. orginally and have watched really difficult pet populations being saved and placed by the SPCA in Pasadena. In San Francisco where I found a dog at my busstop (a puppy with an advanced disease, there was an entire rescue organization that tried to save him. He had to be euthanized (advanced manage). Now the city has one of the most wonderful SPCA’s in California and I watched the dozens of school aged volunteers and fund raising that the community has developed. No reason why NJ cannot do this but if my town is an example, it seems there is little interest in rescue.

  • mn_test347

    “the food set out for them will always attract “new” cats. And feeding cats also promotes abandonment”

    So TNR isn’t the problem – feeding them is. Might want to change the your click-bait title.

  • Penny Branham

    WRONG. Depends on the situation. I have two feral colonies. TNR if you will. They are 12 years old. Over the years myself and others have diligently fed, watered, provided shelter and when needed, vet care for those living there. Many have become tame, become adopted, and homed inside if health conditions warrant that. TNR. When done properly, does not come with a release and ignore option. The mumber of abandoned pets will continue to grow and multiply intil people become more respondible. I don’t see that happening. There are not enuff people who can afford the time to trap and tame, then rehome. TNR, when done correctly, is a realistic answer to a realistic problem. There will always be situations on both sides of every coin that go wrong. Prople die in hospitals from malpractice, more than you know. That’s life.

    • JJ McKibbin

      12 years. Shouldn’t both colonies be gone or very, very nearly so by now? That’s the bill of goods we were sold with TNR: The colonies will attrition away and be eliminated. Of course, everyone now knows that was a lie. Not all the cats get fixed. Kittens are born. New cats immigrate in, attracted by the food and other cats. People see the cats being fed and think that would be a good place to dump off their own unwanted cats. The colonies persist for 10, 12, 15 years or longer. TNR is a cat colony perpetuation plan, not a population reduction plan.

  • Mark Woodward

    I’ve lived next to feeding site feral cat colonies and each time I was over run by mice and rats do to all the cat food left out. Adult rat can fend of a cat and rats and mice easily out smart cats.
    TNR colonies only slow the tide of cats due to low neuter rates and not neutering cats fast enough. Also breeding cats readily join for the food left out. The public is duped into believing TNR is to eventually remove the cats but as all TNR people know the cat colonies go on indefinitely.
    I know a neighborhood who got fed up with all the diseased parasite ridden cats and continually removed them until the cat feeders stopped. The smell, feces, dead cats, litters of kittens flies, scary diseased parasite ridden cats and fleas, rats mice went away. 10 years after the colony feeders gave up the habitat became healthy and the quail and lizards came back and it returned to being a nice place without health hazards.

  • Jennifer

    Cats are NOT “the most deadly invasive species in the world”. Humans are. We created the cat problem, too. I don’t know what the solution is. I don’t think there is one. But no way in hell am I going to trap a healthy innocent being and euthanize it. We all deserve a chance at survival, and life is hard. I’d rather be free and alive even if I’m struggling to survive, than dead.

    • Connie Black
      • Jennifer

        right back atcha: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/stop-blaming-cats-as-many-as-988-million-birds-die-annually-in-window-collisions/2014/02/03/9837fe80-8866-11e3-916e-e01534b1e132_story.html?utm_term=.b20cec221708

        And that doesn’t even factor in the billions (I’m guessing) of chickens and turkeys and ducks, etc. that we raise and slaughter for food.

        And that’s JUST birds. Humans are destroying the PLANET. We are way worse than cats. WAY worse. We’ve already caused numerous species to go EXTINCT. AND we created the cat problem. Anyone who supports euthanizing ferals should also support euthanizing humans. Fair is fair.

        • JJ McKibbin

          Did you even read the article you linked to?

          “The estimate puts windows behind only cats as the largest source of human-related menaces that kill birds directly.” That’s right — cats kill more than windows and all other direct human-caused threats combined. And if you want to use maximum estimates as they did with windows, then cats kill 4 billion birds annually, over 4 times as many as windows.

          The article is about native wild birds, not domestic animals that are raised specifically for human consumption. Don’t conflate the two. And don’t equate humans with cats. It’s ridiculous and nonsensical. We can and do address more than one threat to birds and other native wildlife concurrently. Windows AND cats should be addressed, along with pesticide use, wind turbines, communications towers, light pollution, and the biggie, habitat loss. Allowing cats to free-roam is human-caused, and humans must take steps to mitigate the damage it causes. When remaining habitat is polluted with biological litter such as free-roaming cats, that habitat is worthless to birds. In fact, it acts as a wildlife sink, drawing in birds because it still looks suitable for breeding and feeding, only to lose them down a cat’s throat. Just as we work to reduce pesticide use, develop glass that birds don’t fly into, demand proper siting for wind turbines, preserve habitat, and reduce light pollution, we must also work to remove cats from the environment.

          Cat advocates such as yourself are more than welcome to set up enclosures on your own property to house as many feral cats as you can properly care for. If every cat advocate would do this a sizable number of feral cats could be saved. Any that cannot be placed in enclosed sanctuaries should be euthanized.

          • Jennifer

            Yeah, I skimmed the article and missed that one line. But still, it’s JUST talking about windows killing birds. Humans kill more birds than cats due to deforestation and habitat destruction. And I’m not advocating anything. I am actually working to remove cats from the environment. I’m just not going to kill them. All I’m saying is reminding people that we are way worse than cats. If you advocate killing them, then you should also advocate killing humans. It’s only fair and logical. And I don’t care if a bird is wild or domesticated. A life is a life.
            I don’t have time/energy for this. I skimmed your post so I probably missed something. But I’m unsubscribing from notifications so don’t expect a response.

          • JJ McKibbin

            LOL You don’t have time to read the 4 short paragraphs I wrote but you do have time to add 2 more paragraphs of excuses. I hope when you say you are working to remove cats from the environment that you mean you are placing them in enclosures on your own property. If so, I commend you.

            You claim you believe “a life is a life” but it certainly appears that cat lives are are more valued by you than the lives of all the native birds and critters they kill. Each cat kept alive and uncontained means that dozens and dozens of native birds, frogs, reptiles, and amphibians will die every year. What about those lives? Those animals are sentient beings also. Why not save their lives?

          • Caro

            I have been feeding a feral colony for over 15 years and I have only seen two birds killed by cats. If you put down enough food everyone gets to eat and no one needs to hunt! That is my system and it works!

          • JJ McKibbin

            How much time do you spend each day directly observing your cats?

  • Ahmet Berke Kevser

    Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Which unfortunately gives vile organisations like PETA achance to spread their lies. The only reason PETA is against TNR is they want cats dead. They are vile enough to steal pets from their owners and kill. It is a shame that Nat Geo doesn’t shun these scum.

    http://www.nathanwinograd.com/maya/

  • Michaela Mommyof Babschicasuga

    This is the dumbest crap I have ever read!!! Of course, it comes from a PETA employee. They are known to hate cats and dogs and will kill them in a heart beat!!!

  • Caro

    I have managed a feral colony for over 15 years and this article is untrue, uninformed and unworthy of National Geographic! TNR is not used to trap, spay/neuter and abandon cats. TNR is used to trap feral cats and give them a wellness exam; cats with tumors or severe injuries are humanely euthanized. Once the cats have been examined they are given the rabies vaccine, the FPV (distemper) vaccine, flea medicine, de-worming treatment and finally the spay/neuter. Once all the medical procedures have been completed the cats will remain in recovery for a day and then they will be released back into their colonies with a caretaker to monitor them. The caretaker provides fresh water, food and shelter to the cats on a daily basis. The cats are dependent on the caretaker so they will come to be fed and the caretaker can easily see if someone needs a vet visit. The cats are not abandoned or left to suffer!

    Yes, caretakers do lose cats but only to uninformed self centered extremists like the person who wrote this appalling article! Those people poison cats, deliberately try to run over them and are simply horribly cruel and evil people! As for the cats killing wildlife – what a joke! I have seen cats, raccoons, birds, possum and foxes all at my feeding stations; the different species don’t eat together but they take turns eating the food rather than each other. It is a very workable system in a world where all animals need additional food because humans are decimating their habitats and food sources! As for illness, the author keeps mentioning illnesses and problems that are believed to have been caused by cats or suffered by cats but believed is not proven!

    The Fish and Wildlife Services estimates the number of birds in the United States to be 10 billion and notes that number may jump to 20 billion at peak migration times. How can cats kill 28 billions birds a year when we never have more than 20 billion birds at a time? The cats are not the problem. The Fish and Wildlife Service says that the Ivanpah Solar Plant kills approximately 28,000 birds a year (that’s one every two minutes) by focusing over 300,000 mirrors on three 459-foot towers, generating heat of up to 800 degrees which basically fries any bird who flies by! No cat colony can come close to that kind of damage! Nor do cats do the kind of damage to birds that oil spills (the BP spill alone killed over a million birds), pollution, deforestation and climate change are doing!

    Flea-borne typhus (easily treated with antibiotics) is caused by the Rickettsia bacteria that can infect fleas, and most U.S. cases occur in Texas, Hawaii, and California. In 2008, the CDC and Texas health authorities examined a cluster of flea-borne typhus in Austin and found the Rickettsia bacteria in only 18 percent of cats, as compared to 44 percent of dogs so once again, the author is wrong! People should worry about getting rid of fleas not cats!

    Cats are often wrongly blamed for spreading toxoplasmosis but most cases come from eating undercooked meat! The CDC says toxoplasmosis is the third leading cause of food-borne illness-related death in the USA! Even if a cat is infected with Toxoplasma a person would need to touch the infected cat feces during the brief shedding period and then somehow ingest the feces to get the disease! Don’t blame the cats if people don’t practice basic hygiene or refuse to buy a meat thermometer!

    As for Rabies, per the CDC only 28 people in the US and Puerto Rico have died of rabies since 2008 and none of those individuals contracted it from a cat! Alley Cat Allies says there has not been a case of cat to human rabies since 1975! Plus, caretakers have cats vaccinated!

    Cats outside can get sick however caretakers put antibiotics in wet food to treat the cat. Or they trap the cat, take it to the vet and get treatment injected into the cat. Many caretakers have large cages in garages or sheds where sick cats can be treated and monitored. The author of this article knows nothing about feral cats or feral caretakers however I hope most people know better and care more! National Geographic should be ashamed of themselves for even publishing this!

    • JJ McKibbin

      Boy, where to start.

      You’ve been managing your colony for 15 years, eh? Shouldn’t they be all gone by now? Isn’t that what TNR is supposed to do — eliminate feral cat colonies? Isn’t 15 years long enough? Or do we need to wait 20 years? Or 25 years? Man, you sure must have a bunch of geriatric cats there at this point. Do you keep records of each cat and re-trap each one when it is due for its rabies booster vaccine?

      Regarding wildlife – I don’t doubt that your cats aren’t killing raccoons, opossums, or foxes directly. Eating your cat food with your cats is detrimental to their well-being however. These are wild animals, not pets. Eating cat food put out by you acclimates them to humans, which may well put them at risk when they try to approach other humans. Cat food does not provide proper nutrition for these wild animals. They will not forage for their own proper food if cat food is freely available. Your feeding stations are also concentrating these wild animals in abnormally close proximity. This promotes the spread of disease between the wild animals themselves and between them and your cats. If you are going to insist on feeding feral cats, at least do it in a way that doesn’t put these other native wild mesopredators at risk. As to your cats killing birds — they do. No one disputes this except cat advocates. It is really hard to believe that anyone who spends significant time with outdoor cats can repeat this lie with a straight face. Nearly everyone who allows their cats to free-roam has been “gifted” (a gross abomination of the word if there ever was one), with dead birds (and other small native mammals, reptiles, and amphibians). If the mountain of scientific papers showing this carnage isn’t enough, there are literally hundreds of facebook pages devoted to cats and TNR, many with images and stories about the dead wildlife these precious kitties brought home for their owners. There are thousands of YouTube videos graphically showing this also. The estimate of the number of birds killed by cats annually in the U.S. is 2.4 billion, not 28 billion. That is part of your confusion. This figure dwarfs all other direct human-caused bird mortality combined. You act as if this isn’t possible because a single cat can’t possibly cause that much damage. That is because it isn’t a single cat. It is the cumulative effect of the estimated 90 million feral cats plus another 40 to 60 million pet cats that are allowed to free roam. 2.4 billion works out to just one bird killed every other week for the feral cats alone. More birds are killed by cats every single day than were killed in the BP oil spill disaster.

      You do not understand how toxoplasma gondii, the protozoan parasite that causes toxoplasmosis, reproduces or is spread. Cats are the only source.

      Toxoplasma gondii (Tg) can only complete its life cycle in the intestine of a cat. Only cats shed the parasite’s infectious micro-scopic oocysts (egg-cells) in their feces. Neither birds nor any other animals do that. Only cats. An estimated 70% of free-roaming cats are infected with toxoplasmosis (toxo). Each infected cat sheds the infectious oocysts by the tens of millions. The oocysts remain infectious in soil, water, or air for more than 18 months. Long after the cat feces in which they were shed have decomposed and disappeared, the oocysts are still there, ready to infect their next host. You don’t have to go around eating cat poop to become infected. As stated, the oocysts are microscopic. Hundreds could fit under the tip of your fingernail. Working in your garden where a cat has defecated in the past 2 years could expose you to oocysts. Then it is just a matter of wiping your hand across your sweaty brow, where a drop of sweat could then roll down to your eye, nose, or mouth. Oocysts can also be carried to vegetables, fruit, and other food sources, or to drinking water by rodents, insects, or the wind. That fly that lands on your picnic potato salad for a moment could be bringing you an oocyst. Washing produce before eating it is always a good idea and that may help prevent infection, however if the oocyst lands on a fruit or vegetable in its early stage of development, the fruit or vegetable may encase the oocyst as it grows. Then all the washing in the world won’t get rid of the oocyst. It only takes a single oocyst to become infected. Oocysts can also become aerosolized and inhaled. That cloud of dust as you mow or rake could contain oocysts. So could the dust stirred up by a child in his sandbox. Inhaling just one can cause infection.

      And yes, you can become infected by eating undercooked meat from an infected animal. But how do you think that meat animal became infected? It became infected by ingesting oocysts shed by a cat. The original source of every single case of toxoplasmosis is cats. The only thing that varies is the route of transmission, but cats are always the source. Cats are the only source.

      The CDC also says that cats are, by far, the most frequent domestic animal carrier of rabies. They estimate the 1/3 of the 40,000 rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) treatments given annually in the U.S. are due to exposure from cats. Of course no one gets rabies in the U.S. They get the PEP treatment instead, which is very costly and painful and requires multiple visits to the ER. Rabies is 99.99% fatal. What if someone, a child perhaps, slips through the cracks? The CDC also recommends multiple times on its rabies web-pages to “Call animal control to have stray cats (and dogs) removed”. Nowhere do they recommend TNR, not to mitigate rabies risk or for any other reason. There is no research that suggests that TNR mitigates for rabies risk. The cats may get an initial rabies vaccination but they almost never receive the required one-year rabies booster vaccination or any subsequent booster vaccinations. Every rabies vaccine available requires these boosters. There is no rabies vaccine that is good from 3 years from the initial vaccination. There is no published research suggesting a single rabies vaccination is good for more than one year. Try getting your cat information from somewhere other than Alley Cat Allies. They lie, plain and simple. If you believe their lie that there has not been a human case of rabies transmitted from a cat in the U.S. since 1975, google “Precious Reynolds rabies” for the story of a little girl who got rabies from a cat in a colony near her elementary school in 2011 and miraculously survived thanks to a medically-induced coma.

    • JJ McKibbin

      Boy, where to start.

      You’ve been managing your colony for 15 years, eh? Shouldn’t they be all gone by now? Isn’t that what TNR is supposed to do — eliminate feral cat colonies? Isn’t 15 years long enough? Or do we need to wait 20 years? Or 25 years? Man, you sure must have a bunch of geriatric cats there at this point. Do you keep records of each cat and re-trap each one when it is due for its rabies booster vaccine?

      Regarding wildlife – I don’t doubt that your cats aren’t killing raccoons, opossums, or foxes directly. Eating your cat food with your cats is detrimental to their well-being however. These are wild animals, not pets. Eating cat food put out by you acclimates them to humans, which may well put them at risk when they try to approach other humans. Cat food does not provide proper nutrition for these wild animals. They will not forage for their own proper food if cat food is freely available. Your feeding stations are also concentrating these wild animals in abnormally close proximity. This promotes the spread of disease between the wild animals themselves and between them and your cats. If you are going to insist on feeding feral cats, at least do it in a way that doesn’t put these other native wild mesopredators at risk. As to your cats killing birds — they do. No one disputes this except cat advocates. It is really hard to believe that anyone who spends significant time with outdoor cats can repeat this lie with a straight face. Nearly everyone who allows their cats to free-roam has been “gifted” (a gross abomination of the word if there ever was one), with dead birds (and other small native mammals, reptiles, and amphibians). If the mountain of scientific papers showing this carnage isn’t enough, there are literally hundreds of facebook pages devoted to cats and TNR, many with images and stories about the dead wildlife these precious kitties brought home for their owners. There are thousands of YouTube videos graphically showing this also. The estimate of the number of birds killed by cats annually in the U.S. is 2.4 billion, not 28 billion. That is part of your confusion. This figure dwarfs all other direct human-caused bird mortality combined. You act as if this isn’t possible because a single cat can’t possibly cause that much damage. That is because it isn’t a single cat. It is the cumulative effect of the estimated 90 million feral cats plus another 40 to 60 million pet cats that are allowed to free roam. 2.4 billion works out to just one bird killed every other week for the feral cats alone. More birds are killed by cats every single day than were killed in the BP oil spill disaster.

      You do not understand how toxoplasma gondii, the protozoan parasite that causes toxoplasmosis, reproduces or is spread. Cats are the only source.

      Toxoplasma gondii (Tg) can only complete its life cycle in the intestine of a cat. Only cats shed the parasite’s infectious micro-scopic oocysts (egg-cells) in their feces. Neither birds nor any other animals do that. Only cats. An estimated 70% of free-roaming cats are infected with toxoplasmosis (toxo). Each infected cat sheds the infectious oocysts by the tens of millions. The oocysts remain infectious in soil, water, or air for more than 18 months. Long after the cat feces in which they were shed have decomposed and disappeared, the oocysts are still there, ready to infect their next host. You don’t have to go around eating cat poop to become infected. As stated, the oocysts are microscopic. Hundreds could fit under the tip of your fingernail. Working in your garden where a cat has defecated in the past 2 years could expose you to oocysts. Then it is just a matter of wiping your hand across your sweaty brow, where a drop of sweat could then roll down to your eye, nose, or mouth. Oocysts can also be carried to vegetables, fruit, and other food sources, or to drinking water by rodents, insects, or the wind. That fly that lands on your picnic potato salad for a moment could be bringing you an oocyst. Washing produce before eating it is always a good idea and that may help prevent infection, however if the oocyst lands on a fruit or vegetable in its early stage of development, the fruit or vegetable may encase the oocyst as it grows. Then all the washing in the world won’t get rid of the oocyst. It only takes a single oocyst to become infected. Oocysts can also become aerosolized and inhaled. That cloud of dust as you mow or rake could contain oocysts. So could the dust stirred up by a child in his sandbox. Inhaling just one can cause infection.

      And yes, you can become infected by eating undercooked meat from an infected animal. But how do you think that meat animal became infected? It became infected by ingesting oocysts shed by a cat. The original source of every single case of toxoplasmosis is cats. The only thing that varies is the route of transmission, but cats are always the source. Cats are the only source.

      The CDC also says that cats are, by far, the most frequent domestic animal carrier of rabies. They estimate the 1/3 of the 40,000 rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) treatments given annually in the U.S. are due to exposure from cats. Of course no one gets rabies in the U.S. They get the PEP treatment instead, which is very costly and painful and requires multiple visits to the ER. Rabies is 99.99% fatal. What if someone, a child perhaps, slips through the cracks? The CDC also recommends multiple times on its rabies web-pages to “Call animal control to have stray cats (and dogs) removed”. Nowhere do they recommend TNR, not to mitigate rabies risk or for any other reason. There is no research that suggests that TNR mitigates for rabies risk. The cats may get an initial rabies vaccination but they almost never receive the required one-year rabies booster vaccination or any subsequent booster vaccinations. Every rabies vaccine available requires these boosters. There is no rabies vaccine that is good from 3 years from the initial vaccination. There is no published research suggesting a single rabies vaccination is good for more than one year. Try getting your cat information from somewhere other than Alley Cat Allies. They lie, plain and simple. If you believe their lie that there has not been a human case of rabies transmitted from a cat in the U.S. since 1975, google “Precious Reynolds rabies” for the story of a little girl who got rabies from a cat in a colony near her elementary school in 2011 and miraculously survived thanks to a medically-induced coma.

    • JJ McKibbin

      The CDC also says that cats are, by far, the most frequent domestic animal carrier of rabies. They estimate the 1/3 of the 40,000 rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) treatments given annually in the U.S. are due to exposure from cats. Of course no one gets rabies in the U.S. They get the PEP treatment instead, which is very costly and painful and requires multiple visits to the ER. Rabies is 99.99% fatal. What if someone, a child perhaps, slips through the cracks? The CDC also recommends multiple times on its rabies web-pages to “Call animal control to have stray cats (and dogs) removed”. Nowhere do they recommend TNR, not to mitigate rabies risk or for any other reason. There is no research that suggests that TNR mitigates for rabies risk. The cats may get an initial rabies vaccination but they almost never receive the required one-year rabies booster vaccination or any subsequent booster vaccinations. Every rabies vaccine available requires these boosters. There is no rabies vaccine that is good from 3 years from the initial vaccination. There is no published research suggesting a single rabies vaccination is good for more than one year. Try getting your cat information from somewhere other than Alley Cat Allies. They lie, plain and simple. If you believe their lie that there has not been a human case of rabies transmitted from a cat in the U.S. since 1975, google “Precious Reynolds rabies” for the story of a little girl who got rabies from a cat in a colony near her elementary school in 2011 and miraculously survived thanks to a medically-induced coma.

      • Caro

        Since I quoted the CDC in my response it is clear that I do not get all my information from Alley Cat Allies. I suggest that you stop slandering Alley Cat Allies, a non-profit organization who tries to help cats simply because you don’t like the message they are delivering. They do not lie and did not lie. The CDC says that 90% of all rabies cases occur in wildlife so cats are clearly not the big problem you’d like them to be. In fact, over the last decade the CDC says that there have only been 23 cases of rabies in the US. Of those 23 cases, animal to human transmission occurred 11 times from bats, once from a fox, 8 times from dogs, once from a Mongoose and twice from raccoons. No cat to human transmission occurred. In Precious Reynolds case the source is listed as unknown because transmission via cat was never confirmed.

        The CDC says that bats and mice are a particular problem in carrying rabies and other diseases because they can get into the house and bite someone but the bite is so insignificant that people won’t even notice it. 40,000 people in the US do get the rabies vaccine however the vast majority of those vaccines are given simply as a precautionary measure. 40,000 vaccines out of 325 million people barely counts as a statistic!

        As for the rabies vaccine, I’ve had the vaccine and while it is inconvenient it is not painful. The only reason the vaccine is inconvenient for people is because doctors don’t carry the vaccine due to its high cost, limited shelf life and limited use. This forces people to go to the ER for the vaccines and since they don’t make appointments it can be inconvenient the few weeks you are receiving the vaccine. It’s hardly life altering.

        As for feral cats not being protected after the initial vaccine, there have been many credible studies done on the duration of pet vaccines and many vaccines, including rabies are effective for 7 years. These studies measured blood antibody levels and they are considered accurate. They simply haven’t been received by the mainstream because veterinarians and pharmaceutical companies stand to lose too much money by limiting the need for vaccines. (14% of the average veterinary practices revenue is due to vaccines alone and Merck’s animal health group earns over $3B in revenue annually) Even with humans who have received the rabies vaccine, if the person has received the vaccine and believes they have been exposed or could be exposed to the rabies virus the person’s blood can be tested to see if the vaccine is still providing protection – if so, there is no vaccine required. This allows researchers and animal health workers to avoid excessive vaccinations. One vet tested this theory when he was vaccinated in 2001 and his rabies titers in 2009 were still very high. I find it sad this same level of protection against over exposure to vaccines isn’t afforded to all pets.

    • JJ McKibbin

      Toxoplasma gondii (Tg) can only complete its life cycle in the intestine of a cat. Only cats shed the parasite’s infectious micro-scopic oocysts (egg-cells) in their feces. Neither birds nor any other animals do that. Only cats. An estimated 70% of free-roaming cats are infected with toxoplasmosis (toxo). Each infected cat sheds the infectious oocysts by the tens of millions. The oocysts remain infectious in soil, water, or air for more than 18 months. Long after the cat feces in which they were shed have decomposed and disappeared, the oocysts are still there, ready to infect their next host. You don’t have to go around eating cat poop to become infected. As stated, the oocysts are microscopic. Hundreds could fit under the tip of your fingernail. Working in your garden where a cat has defecated in the past 2 years could expose you to oocysts. Then it is just a matter of wiping your hand across your sweaty brow, where a drop of sweat could then roll down to your eye, nose, or mouth. Oocysts can also be carried to vegetables, fruit, and other food sources, or to drinking water by rodents, insects, or the wind. That fly that lands on your picnic potato salad for a moment could be bringing you an oocyst. Washing produce before eating it is always a good idea and that may help prevent infection, however if the oocyst lands on a fruit or vegetable in its early stage of development, the fruit or vegetable may encase the oocyst as it grows. Then all the washing in the world won’t get rid of the oocyst. It only takes a single oocyst to become infected. Oocysts can also become aerosolized and inhaled. That cloud of dust as you mow or rake could contain oocysts. So could the dust stirred up by a child in his sandbox. Inhaling just one can cause infection.

      And yes, you can become infected by eating undercooked meat from an infected animal. But how do you think that meat animal became infected? It became infected by ingesting oocysts shed by a cat. The original source of every single case of toxoplasmosis is cats. The only thing that varies is the route of transmission, but cats are always the source. Cats are the only source.

  • Lori Choman

    This “blog” is the biggest joke I’ve ever read. Uninformed, half-truths, old information, old data and old wives tales. Obviously written by someone who has never worked in the trenches. Only people who sit in offices and “run” things on a national level believe that people in the trenches abandon those cats. Instead of writing BS like this article, how about you spend a few MONTHS with a real CARE GIVER of a colony. Find out what we do. I have 16 cats in one colony. All fixed, all healthy, all up to date on their shots, all well fed. NONE of which are hunting birds or other wildlife. They eat alongside possums and raccoons, bird feeds hang above their feeders, squirrels and turtles eat at their feeding stations. Everything in my area is well fed so there is no need to feed off wildlife. And yes, my colony is observed during all daylight hours by many volunteers. We have several cameras in place to watch for any signs of aggression, new animals showing up and any cat taking ill.

    And THAT is how you manage a colony. They are not trap, neutered and abandoned. I’d say in my professional opinion the writer of the blog is the one in need of an education.

  • Evelynn Bajana

    I sincerely cannot understand the concept of this article… These are FERAL cats that cannot be domesticated, cannot be placed in adoption and are not abandoned as they have caretakers. As for kittens they can be placed for adoption! Incorrect facts to say the least!!

  • Kapucinka

    My stomach turned as soon as I read that the author is a member of the Peta psychopaths, and that an interviewee called their organization for “help”. PETA KILLS THE VAST MAJORITY OF STRAY/FERAL ANIMALS IT TRAPS AND ONLY A TINY MINORITY ARE ADOPTED. Trapping, neutering and then feeding colonies / giving them to barn owners is the most humane way to solve the problem. Peta’s idea of mercy is killing all animals in advance and not even giving them a chance. Feeding stray cats doesn’t encourage people to abandon animals – dogs have to be chipped by law, plus I’m pretty sure nobody feeds dog colonies, but you still find abandoned dogs. This theory obviously doesn’t work. Killing abandoned animals instead of tackling careless owners and monsters torturing animals is like forcing women to wear sheats over their heads instead of punishing rapists. Nobody calls stray dogs a nuisance, even when you have cases of dogs mauling their owners to death, people will go “Oh, it’s the owner’s fault for not raising him right”. But wanting stray cats dead is perfectly aceptable “because they poop in my garden” and kill birds to eat.
    Nobody suggests killing the thousands of starving kids in poor African countries even though their parents reproduce uncontrollably and many will die of hunger – because it’s cruel and inhuman. Why not extend that sympathy to cats as well? If we have enough money to pay for football and smart phones, we can pay for vets and animal food.

  • Judy

    I agree with what is being said here on this blog. I work with a rescue I also work with a TNR program in my area. We work hard to get homes for kittens and adults. If these cats are left on their own to breed and rebreed the problem just grows and grows. They may only live 2-5 yrs but living unable to breed can extend their life. They were born in the wild and the majority of them can never be tame as they know nothing but the life they have lead. As far as killing birds rabbits squirrels that is what happens in the wild no matter what animal you are talking about. I have a large colony of cats that I feed and shelter ,as I write this we are in the process of trapping to spay and neuter it is the most effective way other than killing them. I do not feel in my heart of hearts that killing them is the right thing to do. They did not ask for this fate to be handed to them humans have caused the biggest part of this problem. If you do not want to live up to the responsibility you said you would in taking on a pet then don’t or find it a good home or some rescue that can. Some of the stuff I have seen would curl your hair. Humans are some of the most in human creatures on this earth. People in ivory towers can say all they want and a lot of stuff looks good on paper but does not always work. I did not start my life out to do this and I do not get paid for anything I do but every time one of the cats come up missing it always hurts me, I just hope they did not suffer long or painfully.

  • Ann Holden

    This post not only makes people who hates cats encouraged but to those who finds a way to decrease inhumane way of killing cats by doing TNR feel effortless. Before we started TNR; we used to pick bodies of little kittens run over by cars, by people and their children killing them. We rescued many kittens and some adult cats. Because noone wants adult cats unless they are extremely friendly. Kittens yes ofcourse they can become friendly but it takes time for adult feral cats to trust being around humans. The rescuers do not have time to train or resources to take time to get adults trained to be friendly. They don’t even have that much space and there aren’t too many fosters either out there to compensate for so many cats. So yes TNR has reduced alot of dead kittens on the streets. Not only that either, it helps them calm down so they are not constantly fighting each other for food or territory and making some people who hates cats hate them more. Yes people who loves cats do not want to put them back outside after TNR and we are one of them, but where to you put them when there is no space anymore? If alot of people participate and help out in this effort then maybe we can get rooms for them, but there are more people who hates cats and then love them out there. People who hates cats will hate cats even if they are not in their yards. They will always make excuses even if there is no excuses. There should be strict law to put those people accountable. As far as diseases goes we have rescued many kittens and cats and none of them had any kind of diseases. There are coyotes out there and even dogs so if you think cat has a disease where do you think cat got it from? So if you think cat is a threat then what about other animals who are feral too? Humans are the main carriers for a lot of diseases and we are the animals too. Shouldn’t we put down humans if they carry diseases too? Where we live we do TNR and we feed and try to get the adults friendly only to find out there is no space for them. We have never seen any cats killing any other animals instead we have seen them playing with the birds or eating together with other animals. So to anyone who is reading this article please do your own research. This article can create problems instead of solution if read by wrong people.

About the Blog

Researchers, conservationists, and others share stories, insights and ideas about Our Changing Planet, Wildlife & Wild Spaces, and The Human Journey. More than 50,000 comments have been added to 10,000 posts. Explore the list alongside to dive deeper into some of the most popular categories of the National Geographic Society’s conversation platform Voices.

Opinions are those of the blogger and/or the blogger’s organization, and not necessarily those of the National Geographic Society. Posters of blogs and comments are required to observe National Geographic’s community rules and other terms of service.

Voices director: David Braun (dbraun@ngs.org)

Social Media